Tentative Rulings
Nevada City
Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309.
Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at OA@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309 by 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court. Any argument is limited to five (5) minutes per party, unless the Court determines additional argument time is needed. See California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.
Personal appearances are permitted. You may also appear via video by arranging a remote appearance at the time notice of request for oral argument.
UNLESS THE COURT ORDERS OTHERWISE, THE PREVAILING PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A FORMAL ORDER SETTING OUT VERBATIM THE TENTATIVE RULING ANNOUNCED HEREIN (OR THE ORDER OF THE COURT FOLLOWING ORAL ARGUMENT SHOULD IT DIFFER) AND SHALL, THEREAFTER, PREPARE, FILE AND SERVE NOTICE OF THE ORDER PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.1312.
June 27, 2025 Civil Tentative Rulings
June 20, 2025 Civil Tentative Rulings
June 13, 2025 Civil Tentative Rulings
June 6, 2025 Civil Tentative Rulings
May 30, 2025 Civil Tentative Rulings
May 23, 2025 Civil Tentative Rulings
These are the Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at OA@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309 by 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court. Any argument is limited to five (5) minutes per party, unless the Court determines additional argument time is needed. See California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.
Personal appearances are permitted. You may also appear via video by arranging a remote appearance at the time notice of request for oral argument.
Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not be able to provide court reporters for probate or civil law and motion hearings and does not provide court reporters for case management conferences. Any litigant who wants a record of a law and motion matter or a case management conference must arrange for the presence of a court reporter at his or her expense. See Local Rule 10.00.3 B.
FOR ALL LAW AND MOTION MATTERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED, THE PREVAILING PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A FORMAL ORDER SETTING OUT VERBATIM THE TENTATIVE RULING ANNOUNCED HEREIN (OR THE ORDER OF THE COURT FOLLOWING ORAL ARGUMENT SHOULD IT DIFFER FROM THE TENTATIVE RULING) IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA RULE OF COURT 3.1312 AND SHALL, THEREAFTER, PREPARE, FILE AND SERVE NOTICE OF THE ORDER PURSUANT TO THE RULE OF COURT.
June 27, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P20-16654 In the Matter of JULIAN N COSTA
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservator is acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for June 25, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee is waived.
- P20-16664 In the Matter of SANDRA ROBINSON
No appearances are required. The petition for approval of second accounting and for its settlement is granted as prayed.
- P82-09460 In the Matter of MELANIE D DYKSTRA
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservator is acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for June 25, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee is waived.
- PR0000688 In the Matter of JAMES D BRUMM
No appearances are required. This matter is off calendar.
- PR0000728 In the Matter of John Bruce Bianchi
Appearances are required. The court is favorably inclined to grant the petition to administer, however, the court seeks clarity whether alternative executor Brittany Ray Jimenez has also declined to serve as administrator. Petitioner shall be prepared to inform the court on Ms. Jimenez’ position and properly file a declination to serve as executor from Ms. Jimenez if appropriate.
- PR0000736 In the Matter of Rollin Wayne Shively
No appearances are required. The court has received notice that all parties have now been served. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed. Bond is set at $433,449 as a waiver of bond has not been obtained from all beneficiaries. Petitioner shall secure a bond and file proof of the same with the court.
- PR0000756 In The Matter of Weston, Violet
No appearances are required. The petition for appointment of probate conservatorship has a number of deficiencies. The court continues the petition to September 5, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Notice and service does not appear to have been provided to all parties. Petitioner shall provide notice of the petition and the continued court date to all parties as required by law (See Form GC-020). The citation for conservatorship filed with the court is not completed. Petitioner shall file a completed citation prior to the continued court date. (See Form GC-320). The medical assessment declaration filed with the court is not completed. Petitioner shall file a completed medical declaration prior to the continued court date (See Form GC-335). Petitioner requests bond to be waived in the petition. However, no explanation is given as to why bond should be waived. Petitioner shall file a supplemental declaration indicating why bond should be waived. (See Form GC-310 section 1.c.).Finally, the court appoints Richard Keene Esq., to represent proposed conservatee. The clerk shall notify Mr. Keene.
- PR0000764 In Re: Estate of Leonard Berardi
No appearances are required. The spousal property petition is granted as prayed.
- PR0000773 In the Matter of Joan Ingram
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
- PR0000775 In Re The Tozzi/Frazier Family Trust
Appearances are required on petitioner’s request to determine title to trust, invalidate deed, determine questions of construction of trust instrument, determine to whom property shall pass upon final termination and for attorney’s fees and costs.
- PR0000777 In the Matter of LINNETTE SORENSEN-WOODWARD
No appearances are required. The petition for an order confirming trust assets is granted as prayed.
- PR0000779 In the Matter of Jesus Gabriel Guadalupe Colorado
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation report. Additionally, Alta California Regional Center has requested additional time to complete their report. The court continues this matter for receipt of the reports to September 5, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date.
- PR0000780 Estate of Dana Hopkins aka Dana Edward Hopkins aka Dana E. Hopkins
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. A signed duties and liabilities statement (Form DE-147) appears to still be outstanding. Petitioner shall file the outstanding item no later than two weeks prior to the continued court date. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date as required by law.
- PR0000781 In the Matter of David Boyntom
No appearances are required. The petition for confirmation of trust assets is granted as prayed.
- PR0000786 In the Matter of Gary Spencer
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
- PR0000787 In the Matter of Julie Barnum
No appearances are required. Based upon the petition provided, the court directs the petitioner to distribute the proceeds of the sale of the Auburn property to the Survivor’s Trust and Bypass Trust in equal shares as evidenced by the Trust and Grant Deed executed by the grantor.
June 20, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- CU0000316 Mardi Fisher v. Brandon Williams, et al.
No appearances are required. The request for approval of the referee plan is granted as prayed. A proposed order has already been submitted.
- P07-14542 In the Matter of Michael A Powers, et al.
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to August 27, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court seeks clarity from the trustee on the property on hand at the end of the reporting period. Trustee shall file a declaration no later than 2 weeks prior to the continued date clarifying the financial state of the trust at the close of the reporting period. Trustee shall give notice of the continued date to all parties.
- P15-15875 In the Matter of Sharon Beatty
Appearances are required. The court will hear argument limited to no more than five minutes per side regarding the petition to remove Lori Greeninger and appoint Mark Dobson as personal representative. The parties shall be prepared to set a hearing regarding the various issues delineated in the 23 May 2025 Dobson statement of disputed facts and to provide the court time estimates for the same.
- P19-16469 In the Matter of Roland Vieira
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000451 Conservatorship of Carolee Taylor
No appearances are required. The petition for allowance of court appointed attorney fees/costs is granted as prayed. A proposed order has already been submitted.
- PR0000478 In the Matter of Mark Miller
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservators are acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for April 23, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- PR0000493 In the Matter of Walter T. Branson
No appearances are required. On April 25, 2025, the court granted counsel Haas’s March 7, 2025, request to be relieved. On April 25, 2025, counsel filed a declaration seeking to withdraw the request and indicating that she wished to refile the request to ensure proper notice. The court vacates its April 28, 2025, order relieving counsel. Counsel Haas’s April 28, 2025, motion to withdraw is granted effective upon the filing of a proof of service of the order relieving counsel upon her client.
- PR0000645 In the Matter of Walter Ingram
No appearances are required. The petition for order accepting transfer is granted. The conservatorship of the person and estate shall continue in California. The conservatorship appears to be warranted. The conservators are acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment, and as well as the conservatee’s estate. The next annual review is set for February 27, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee is due forthwith. An annual accounting shall be filed prior to the next annual review.
- PR0000665 In the Matter of Faith and Hope Cline
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation report. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000668 In the Matter of Sage Marie Davis Da Rosa
No appearances are required. The petition is granted as prayed. A proposed order has been submitted.
- PR0000764 Estate of Leonard Berardi
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the spousal property petition is continued to June 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6 to be heard by the Hon. Stuart Pollak.
- PR0000765 In the Matter of Elizabeth Short
No appearances are required. The petition for order determining title to real property is granted as prayed.
- PR0000768 In the Matter of Cynthia Elizalde
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to August 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court notes a number of deficiencies with the petition. The petition seeks a conservatorship of the person. However, in various accompanying forms the petitioner indicates a conservator of the estate as well. If the petitioner is seeking both a conservatorship of the person and estate, an amended petition must be filed, served and noticed accordingly. Additionally, the filed capacity declaration (GC-335) is not completed. Petitioner shall file a completed capacity declaration prior to the continued court date. The court notes that section 4 of the confidential supplemental information form (GC-312) is not completely filled out. Petitioner shall file an amended form GC-312 prior to the continued court date. Petitioner shall also lodge a proposed order for appointment of a court investigator no later than June 24, 2025. Petitioner shall give notice of the continued court date as required by law.
The court appoints the court investigator to complete an investigation report. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator and telephonically notify the court investigator. Additionally, the court appoints Richard Keene, Esq., to represent the proposed conservatee. The clerk shall send notice to Mr. Keene.
- PR0000770 In the Matter of Roy Bernards
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation report. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator. The court appoints Valerie Logsdon, Esq., to represent proposed conservatee. The clerk shall send notice to Ms. Logsdon.
An objection has been filed by Tyler Bernards. The court encourages counsel for the parties to meet and confer. Any response to the objection by petitioner and the position of the conservatee as to the conservatorship shall be filed no later than 10 court days prior to the next hearing. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date.
- PR0000774 In The Matter Of Debra Jean Taylor
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to August 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Proof of publication (Prob. Code § 8121), duties and liabilities acknowledgment for both petitioners (Prob. Code § 8404), and waivers of bond from Judy Rice and Tom Taylor appear to be outstanding. Petitioners shall file the outstanding items no later than 10 court days prior to the continued court date. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date.
June 13, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P06-14356 In the Matter of ALAN NICOL 1992 REVOCABLE TRUST
No appearances are required. The petition for settlement/approval of the twentieth account of trustee and for approval of trustee compensation is approved as prayed. A proposed order has already been submitted.
- P08-14754 In the Matter of MAGGIE ECHTERNACHT
No appearances are required. The court is in receipt of conservators’ notice form GC-079 filed May 21, 2025. Form GC-079 does not provide notice of the date and time of the hearing on the petition to transfer. A properly executed form GC-020 can be utilized if conservators wishes. Additionally, conservators may contact the Nevada County Superior Court’s Self-Help Center for information if needed. The court continues this matter to August 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Conservators shall provide notice of the petition and continued hearing date to those entitled to notice and provide proof of service of the same to the court in advance of the continued date.
- P17-16097 In the Matter of CONNIE DUFOUR
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person and estate shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservator is acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment, and as well as the conservatee’s estate. The next biennial review is set for June 18, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. It appears that the conservatee’s estate has sufficient assets for purposes of the court investigator assessment, which shall be paid by the estate forthwith. A proposed order shall be submitted by the investigator.
- P17-16181 In the Matter of ANDREW JOSEPH GRAYBILL
No appearances are required. The petition to transfer proceedings to Yuba County is granted as prayed. A review hearing is set for September 5, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to confirm Yuba County has received the transfer. - PR0000712 In the Matter of ZANE DAVIS
No appearances are required. The third amended petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
June 6, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P14-15589 In the Matter of JOHANNA PEASE
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.The sixth account and report of conservators, petitioner for approval of fund transfers, and petition for allowance of attorney compensation is granted as prayed.
- P14-15598 In the Matter of KEVIN TAYLOR WESTPHALEN
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- P16-15924 In the Matter of KYLE M. LYNCH
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- P18-16328 In the Matter of CODY PORTERFIELD
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- P20-16664 In the Matter of SANDRA ROBINSON
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- P22-17034 In the Matter of DIANNA LYNN JEFFREY
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000426 In the Matter of RENEE S. MARSHALL
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person and estate shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservator is acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment and finances. The next biennial review is set for March 12, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee for this biennial review is due forthwith.The court grants conservator’s request for waiver of accountings pursuant to Probate Code section 2628. Further accountings are not required absent further order of the court pursuant to section 2628(b) or otherwise.
- PR0000430 In the Matter of ISAIAH SCHNEIDER
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for biennial review. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator. - PR0000597 In the Matter of the JOSHUA CAMBERLAN SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST #2
No appearances are required.
The 10 April 2024 unopposed petition for confirmation of appointment of trustee, for determination of bond, to determine construction of trust and to whom property shall pass, and for instructions, is granted as follows:
Confirmation of Trustee
In the instant case, Barry Richards and Paige Millard, the then-serving limited conservators for Joshua Camberlan, sought to remove CAPS OF SANTA BARBARA (“CAPS”) as trustee, and took preliminary action to do so; however, CAPS ultimately resigned on December 18, 2023. Under these circumstances, Section 4.2 of the trust mandated the procedure for selection of a successor: “a majority of the current income Beneficiaries (or their guardians, if minors) of any trusts created hereunder shall elect one or more Successor Trustees.”
As of January 13, 2025, a majority of the then-current income beneficiaries, namely: conservatee Joshua Camberlan (through his conservators), CAPS (the PROVIDER OF EXPERT ADVICE) and MOMENTUM/WORK INC. (the DAY HABILITATION SERVICES PROVIDER), have either appointed Matthew Quentmeyer to serve as successor trustee or confirmed, ratified and consented to the same. Matthew Quentmeyer is confirmed to be the valid and currently serving successor trustee pursuant to Section 4.2 of the trust. In the alterative, he is appointed as trustee pursuant to the court’s discretionary authority under Probate Code section 15660.
Bond
Pursuant to Probate Code section 15602(c), the court sets bond at $5,185,000.00. Successor trustee shall secure a bond and file proof of the same with the court.
Construction of Charitable Service Provider Distribution Provision
Upon the death of the conservatee, the trust requires the trustee to distribute fifty percent (50%) of the remaining balance of the trust to the Nature Conservancy and “fifty percent (50%) to local charitable service providers that have been of assistance to [the conservatee] during his lifetime….” Trust, Article 3, ¶ m. The “portion of the Trust representing the DISTRIBUTION TO LOCAL SERVICE AGENCIES shall be allocated as follows[:]”
80% of this share is to be distributed among JOSHUA’S SUPPORTED LIVING SERVICES PROVIDERS serving from 2007 through the term of the Trust. Each year of incumbency will count as a Credit Year and the distribution to each SUPPORTED LIVING SERVICES PROVIDER will be based on its proportion of the sum of Credit Years.
15% of this share is to be distributed among JOSHUA’S DAY HABILITATION SERVICES PROVIDERS serving from 2007 through the term of the Trust. Each year of incumbency will count as a Credit Year and the distribution to each DAY HABILITATION SERVICES PROVIDER will be based on its proportion of the sum of Credit Years.
5% of this share is to be distributed among PROVIDERS OF EXPERT ADVICE TO THE TRUSTEE serving from 2007 through the term of the Trust.
Each year of incumbency will count as a Credit Year and the distribution to each PROVIDER OF EXPERT ADVICE TO THE TRUSTEE will be based on its proportion of the sum of Credit Years.
Ibid.
The trust requires “service providers” to have 501(c)3 tax status (as a not-for-profit organization) to “be designated as an incumbent provider,” to be included on the trust’s “Schedule of Planned Distributions,” and ultimately to receive distributions. See ibid. Entities which lack such status do not qualify as local service agency beneficiaries under the trust. NURSECORE and/or NURSECORE OF SANTA BARBARA are ineligible to meet the designation of incumbent service provider and are not local service agency beneficiaries. BRIGHTSTAR and/or BRIGHTSTAR OF SANTA BARBARA are similarly ineligible to meet the designation of incumbent service provider and are not local service agency beneficiaries. The rights and interests of NURSECORE and/or NURSECORE OF SANTA BARBARA and BRIGHTSTAR and/or BRIGHTSTAR OF SANTA BARBARA in the trust terminate based on these findings of ineligibility. The court need not interpret and construct the term “local” in light of these findings.
With respect to the SUPPORTED LIVING SERVICES PROVIDERS, DEVEREUX-CALIFORNIA was the only designated incumbent service provider and had credit years from 2007–2016. There was no other incumbent provider with earned credit years; hence the pro-rata provision is inapplicable. This entity is entitled to the full 80% share of the 50% distribution to local service agencies.
With respect to the DAY HABILITATION SERVICES PROVIDERS, MOMENTUM/WORK, INC. formerly UCP/WORK, INC. was the only designated incumbent service provider from 2007–2025. There was no other incumbent provider with earned credit years; hence the pro-rata provision is inapplicable. This entity is entitled to the full 15% share of the 50% distribution to local service agencies.
With respect to the PROVIDERS OF EXPERT ADVICE TO THE TRUSTEE, CAPS was the designated incumbent service provider for 2007–2023. There was no other incumbent provider with earned credit years; hence the pro-rata provision is inapplicable. This entity is entitled to the full 5% share of the 50% distribution to local service agencies.
Petitioner shall prepare and lodge an appropriate order after hearing and shall serve a copy of the final order on all interested parties with an appropriate proof of service.
- PR0000667 In the Matter of CYNTHIA E. DELL
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to confirm the June 17, 2025 hearing regarding petitioner/administrator Morgan’s February 14, 2025, petition to identify heirs (alleged heirs Roloff, Long and Webb) and his February 14, 2025 petition for instructions (regarding an alleged real property lease/purchase agreement with Roloff). Petitioner has presented a witness list with time estimates. Any other party presenting evidence shall be prepared to identify all witnesses and time estimates for the same.
11. PR0000754 In the Matter of BONITA A. BRAND
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed. The court, upon reconsideration, concludes that notice to Grant Pitchess or any potential heir(s) of the same is not required. The will includes a provision that all beneficiaries must survive decedent for 45 days to receive property under the will. Given this expression of “contrary intention,” any issue of Grant Pitchess, a deceased transferee, would not take in the transferee’s place. See Probate Code section 2110 (b).
May 30, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P01-13326 In the Matter of Wilfred Martinez
No appearances are required. Notice of the petition for the eleventh account and report does not appear to have been provided to the conservatee. See Prob. Code § 1460(b)(2). The court continues this matter to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued date as required by law. Additionally, Petitioner shall submit a supplemental declaration clarifying the “unknown charges” referenced in the summary of account.
- P15-15875 In the Matter of Sharon Beatty
Petitioner Paul Manka’s request for statutory and extraordinary attorney’s fees is denied without prejudice. Petitioner seeks attorney’s fees for work performed on behalf of Lori A. Greeninger, to include the filing of a request for approval of first and final account and report and petition for settlement. However, that petition has not yet been approved; as such, petitioner’s request is premature. Additionally, Probate Code section 10814 states, “If there are two or more attorneys for the personal representative, the attorney's compensation shall be apportioned among the attorneys by the court according to the services actually rendered by each attorney or as agreed to by the attorneys.” Since the first and final account has not yet been settled, the court is unable to determine the applicability of section 10814 under these circumstances.Mark Dobson’s unopposed request that estate property be turned over to Benjamin Harvey, Esq., is granted. Counsel Manka is directed to turn over 125 Troy ounces of silver and keys to Lori Greeninger’s storage unit to Counsel Harvey pending further order of the court. Counsel Harvey is ordered to maintain those items in a safe deposit box and provide evidence of compliance within five court days of this order. The items shall not be accessed without further order of the court.
- P20-16684 In the Matter of Dickie Marra
An appearances is required. Petitioner shall explain why four plus years (since October 2020) were required to complete administration of this estate. The court is favorably inclined to grant the petition for final distribution.
- P22-16995 In the Matter of Phyllis Graham
No appearances are required. The court continues the order to show cause hearing to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit petitioner additional time to submit the accounting.
- PR0000326 In the Matter of Jamie Dickerson
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. The court continues this matter for receipt of the report to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.Additionally, the court is in receipt of conservator’s request to continue the accounting for a period of one year. The court is not favorably inclined to grant such a long continuance. Co-conservators shall file an accounting prior to the continued court date.
- PR0000532 In the Matter of Jacob Bieker
An appearance is required. The inventory and appraisal have not been approved by the court’s appointed referee, Kevin Eckard. An amended inventory and appraisal is required and shall be filed two weeks prior to the next hearing date. In addition, the court needs clarification as to whether the other intestate heirs have waived their right to any portion of the estate and assigned the same to petitioner. The petition for final distribution is continued to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. for review of the amended inventory and appraisal. In addition, the court requires all intestate heirs to be present, either in person or remotely for the hearing, as the court wishes to personally confirm any waiver/assignment of rights with them. Petitioner shall give notice of the same to all intestate heirs.
- PR0000634 In the Matter of Alan Bernard
No appearances are required. The spousal property petition is granted as prayed.
- PR0000736 In the Matter of Rollin Shively
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. No later than one week prior to the continued court date, petitioner shall provide a declaration regarding his efforts to provide notice to Rhonda Ceritelli. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued date to all parties.
- PR0000752 In the Matter of Heather Sanzone
Appearances are required. The court is favorably inclined to grant the request as prayed. Petitioner has submitted a proof of service of upon Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., but the same entity is not listed on the notice of hearing (DE-115). Petitioner shall confirm notice was provided.
- PR0000762 In the Matter of Arthur Gallez
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioner shall provide proof of publication prior to the continued court date. See Probate Code § 8121. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued date to all parties.
- PR0000763 In the Matter of Donna Sauer, aka Donna Sauer
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
May 23, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P09-14943 In the Matter of Sean Krulisky
Appearances are required. Conservators Vincent Krulisky and Annette Lienhart shall show cause, if any, why the California conservatorship should not be terminated. Vincent Krulisky shall confirm his current address for service purposes.
- P21-16866 In the Matter of Wilhelm Disselhoff
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, this matter is continued to July 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Conservator shall file a declaration indicating her position on whether a final accounting is required in light of the court’s August 20, 2021 order.
- P94-11981 In the Matter of Zachary Craig Skaggs
Appearances are required. The court requests an update on the status of the transfer of the conservatorship to Santa Barbara Superior Court.
- PR0000253 In the Matter of Gerald W. Momii
No appearances are required. The petition for allowance of statutory compensation to attorney, authority to reimburse attorneys for costs advances, and for final distribution is granted as prayed.
- PR0000368 In the Matter of the Estate of William Trumbo
No appearances are required. The court grants petitioner another six months to continue to administer the estate and sets a further review hearing for November 14, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- PR0000442 In the Matter of The Sandon Trust
No appearances are required. The petition to approve the settlement agreement is granted as prayed. The court retains jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- PR0000638 In the Matter of William Aguilar
Appearances are required. The parties shall meet and confer regarding a discovery schedule, a date for a mediation before a mutually acceptable mediator, and a trial date. The court intends to set firm deadlines for the same.
- PR0000672 In the Matter of Earlene Tankersley
Appearances are required. Ms. Bond shall show cause for her failure to appear on April 4, 2025 and on May 2, 2025. Ms. Bond shall advise the court whether she intends to proceed with her February 19, 2025 petition and shall also show cause why her petition should not be dismissed for her failure to prosecute the same.Ms. Massey shall advise the court whether she intends to proceed with her February 7, 2025 petition and shall also show cause why her petition should not be dismissed for her failure to prosecute the same.
If either Ms. Bond or Massey intends to proceed with their petition, they must comply with all procedural requirements for each petition, including notice to all required parties (including the Attorney General given the potential charitable devise), service, publication, filing of signed duties, and lodging of the original will. In addition, if a cross-petition will continue, and the alleged will is subject to contest, any objector, including the public administrator, must comply with the objection and notice requirements of Probate Code section 8250, et seq. A hearing regarding these petitions will be set for July 18, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. All procedural requirements must be timely completed for a hearing that date. The court has reviewed the May 19, 2025 declaration of Ms. Bond; it appears that the Attorney General has still not been served with a copy of Ms. Bond’s petition and notice of hearing as required under Probate Code section 8111.
Ms. Bond’s May 21, 2025 motion to compel will also be heard on July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. for. Ms. Bond shall give notice to the Attorney General of such hearing. All parties are reminded to give notice to all parties in connection with all scheduled proceedings.
- PR0000690 In the Matter of Fred G. Dean-Turner
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person and estate of Fred G. Dean-Turner is granted as prayed. The court sets a first annual review on May 15, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Conservator or any interested party may bring a separate noticed motion regarding the trust if deemed warranted.
- PR0000698 In the Matter of Antonio Maresca
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to July 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservator and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000726 In the Matter of Richard Samuel Bartholomew
Appearances are required.The court has reviewed the public administrator’s May 20, 2025 declaration and update. The parties shall update the court on the status of the February 14, 2025 petition of the administrator and the March 28, 2025 petition of Lipski-Mosher.
The Lipski-Mosher petition has numerous defects which must be remedied: (1) there has been inadequate notice of the hearing and service; (2) there is no publication; (3) petitioner is the alternate executor and there has been no declination by the named executor, Corinne Mooers, and (4) signed duties and liabilities have not been filed. If Ms. Lipski-Mosher intends to proceed, she must remedy address all of these issues no later than July 3, 2025. A hearing regarding these petitions will be set for August 1, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. All procedural requirements must be timely completed for a hearing that date.
In addition, if a cross-petition will continue, and the alleged will is subject to contest, any objector, including the public administrator, must comply with the objection and notice requirements of Probate Code section 8250, et seq.
- PR0000739 In the Matter of Sylvester Robinson
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate of Sylvester Robinson is granted as prayed.
May 16, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P11-15182 In the Matter of Jacquelyn Munoz
No appearances are required. On May 9, 2025, the court granted the petition to fix residence outside California subject to conservator providing proof that Idaho has established a conservatorship by the review date. On its own motion, the court continues the biennial review to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Additionally, the court has not received the investigation review report. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservator and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator. The investigator shall provide a copy of the report prior to the continued court date.
- P19-16497 In the Matter of Jonathan G. Best
No appearances are required. The petition for approval of compensation to court-appointed counsel is granted as prayed.
- PR0000003 In the Matter of Jade Kamal Rios
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservator and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000117 In the Matter of Christopher Hogue
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, and sets an order to show cause hearing for the same day and time. Conservator shall show cause why she failed to file and serve an accounting as ordered by the court on March 14, 2025. The clerk shall give notice of the order to show cause hearing.
- PR0000207 In the Matter of Marcia Bauer
No appearances are required. The first and final report by administrator, waiver of accounting, administrator’s statutory fees, attorney’s fees and costs, holdback, and final distribution are granted as prayed.
- PR0000453 In the Matter of Suzanne M. Perry-Miller
No appearances are required. The petition to appoint a successor conservator of the person and state is granted as prayed. Petitioner Matt Miller is appointed as conservator in place of Leticia Garcia. Additionally, on its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Sept. 6. Leticia Garcia shall file and serve an updated accounting as previously ordered by the court within the time requirements of the Probate Code prior to the continued court date.
- PR0000543 In the Matter of James David Varner
No appearances are required. The petition for final distribution is granted as prayed.
- PR0000557 In the Matter of Michael Zhukov
Appearances are not required. This matter has been removed from calendar in light of the notice of settlement.
- PR0000613 In the Matter of Susanna Laureyssen
No appearances are required. The petition for final distribution is granted as prayed.
- PR0000640 In the Matter of Alexandra Zhukov
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of mediation and resolution.
- PR0000659 In the Matter of Ian Fredrick Ayton
No appearances are required. The petition for substituted judgment to create and fund a revocable trust and execute a pour-over will is granted as prayed.
- PR0000712 In the Matter of Zane Davis
No appearances are required. The petitioner has noticed the amended petition hearing for June 20, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court continues this matter to that date and time. There is no waiver of bond by Shannin O’Connell on file. Petitioner shall either provide a signed waiver of bond by Ms. O’Connell two weeks prior to the next court date or the court will set bond.
- PR0000714 In the Matter of Dylan Melanson
No appearances are required. The petition to appoint a limited conservatorship of the person is granted as prayed. The court sets a first annual review on March 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- PR0000719 In the Matter of Jeffrey Stephenson
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservator and court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000747 In the Matter of Tobias Criss-Harvey
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The petition lacks notice and proof of service of notice. Petitioner shall file and serve the same in accordance with the Probate Code prior to the continued court date.
- PR0000748 Estate of Rita Stokes
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The petition lacks a signed duties and liabilities statement. Petitioner shall file the same two weeks prior to the next court date. Petitioner shall give notice of the continued court date.
- PR0000749 In the Matter of Betty Taylor
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
- PR0000754 In the Matter of Bonita Brand
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The petition has a number of deficiencies. The petition does not include proof of publication. See Prob. Code § 8121. There is no signed duties and liabilities statement. See Prob. Code § 8404. The proof of service is not completely filled out. See Prob. Code § 8110. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date as required by law. Petitioner may wish to consult counsel or may seek access to legal resources at the Nevada County Court Self-Help Center.
- PR0000759 In the Matter of the Renfro Family Trust
No appearances are required. The petition to determine entitlement to distribute for a pretermitted spouse under Probate Code section 11700 is denied without prejudice.
Probate Code section 11700 provides: “At any time after letters are first issued to a general personal representative and before an order for final distribution is made, the personal representative, or any person claiming to be a beneficiary or otherwise entitled to distribution of a share of the estate, may file a petition for a court determination of the persons entitled to distribution of the decedent's estate.”
Here, this court has no jurisdiction to grant relief under this provision of law at this time. No proceedings to administer an estate have been commenced and no letters have issued. See, e.g., Smith v. Westerfield (1891) 88 Cal. 374, 380 (jurisdictional nature of statutory provisions related to probate ); see also Cal. Prac. Guide: Probate, Ch. 15-E at 15:636 (“ Petitions to determine distribution rights may be filed at any time after letters are first issued to a general personal representative and before an order for final distribution is made. [Prob.C. § 11700 ].”)
May 9, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P11-15182 In the Matter of JACQUELYN MUNOZ
Appearances are required. The court is favorably inclined to grant the petition. The court is in receipt of conservator’s proof of service filed April 29, 2025. Conservator shall confirm that all interested parties (P. Munoz, D. Standring, Jessica Munoz and Jacquelyn Munoz, conservatee) were provided with notice of the May 9, 2025, continued petition date as required by California Probate Code section 2352, and file proof of service. If notice has been properly addressed, the court: will set a review hearing August 1, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6; and will direct conservator to either initiate conservatorship proceedings in Idaho or a petition to transfer the conservatorship prior to the continued review date.
- P12-15334 In the Matter of HELEN POWELL
No appearances are required. The court has not received a status report from the court investigator or the conservator. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, for receipt of a report from both the investigator and conservator. The court investigator and conservator shall file their reports no later than 2 weeks prior to the continued date. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to conservator and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- P14-15643 In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER JOSHUA HOWIE
Appearances are required. The petition for substituted judgment to sign a will and create and fund an irrevocable trust is granted as prayed. The parties shall advise the court whether any future request is anticipated in connection with the current conservatorship of the estate.
- P15-15875 In the Matter of SHARON BEATTY
Appearances are required. The parties shall update the court on the status of settlement. The court was previously advised that a petition to approve a settlement, appoint a personal representative and distribution would be filed. No petition has been filed. In addition, counsel Harvey was previously directed to prepare an order for George Beauty, Russel Beauty and Nancy Guerra to show cause why the noted petition should not be approved. No proposed order to show cause has been lodged.
- P18-16433 In the Matter of CONNOR ENGEL
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservators and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- P20-16664 In the Matter of SANDRA ROBINSON
No appearances are required. The order to show cause issued to petitioner is discharged in the interests of justice. The court confirms the June 27, 2025, hearing date as to the second accounting.
- P21-16975 In the Matter of ELLIOTT ROBERT HASTINGS
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservator and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000169 In the Matter of THE JAMES J. BRICK SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST
No appearances are required. The first account and report of public guardian, trustee of special needs trust and petition for fees for trustee and her attorney are granted as prayed.
- PR0000482 Conservatorship of EDWARD DURAN
No appearances are required. The first account and report of conservator of the person and estate and petition for fees for conservator and her attorney are granted as prayed.
- PR0000495 In the Matter of DAVID RANDOLPH GRIFFIS
No appearances are required. The petition lacks the required notice and proof of service of notice. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioners shall service notice of the petition and continued date on all interested parties as required and shall submit proof of service to the courty no later than 2 weeks prior to the continued court date.
- PR0000710 In the Matter of MILLER ERNEST HARPER
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit adequate notice with proof of service. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued hearing date to all interested parties.
- PR0000711 Guardianship of ASHER KEENAN KULP and CONNOR CAMERON KULP
No appearances are required. The court has not received the report from the court investigator. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, for receipt of a report from the court investigator. The court investigator shall file their report no later than 2 weeks prior to the continued date. The clerk shall provide notice of the continued court date. The clerk shall provide a copy of the minutes to the conservator and the court investigator. The clerk shall also telephonically notify the court investigator.
- PR0000740 In the Matter of VIRGINIA OWEN WEDBERG
No appearances are required. The petition to determine succession to real property is granted as prayed.
- PR0000741 Estate of MARIE S. SAWTELLE
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate of Marie S. Sawtelle is granted as prayed.
- PR0000743 In the Matter of STEVEN E. GRAGG
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate of Steven E. Gragg is granted as prayed.
- PR0000744 Estate of JANICE ANN BARBARO
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate of Janice Barbaro is granted as prayed.
- PR0000745 In the Matter of KAREN TURLEY ADAMS
No appearances are required. The petition for appointment of successor trustee is granted as prayed.
May 2, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- CU0001700 In the Matter of City of Nevada City
No appearances are required. The court has received the receiver’s status report and the objection filed in connection therewith. The receiver indicates that a recommended plan will be submitted in the future. For now, the court continues the status conference to June 2, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued conference.
- P08-14754 In the Matter of Maggie B. Echternacht
No appearances are required. The Court continues the petition to transfer hearing to June 13, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court is not in receipt of a proof of service of the petition to transfer. Notice is required pursuant to Probate Code section 2001(b). Conservators shall provide notice of the petition and continued hearing date to those entitled to notice under Probate Code section 1822, and provide proof of service of the same to the court in advance of the continued date.
- P11-15188 In the Matter of Jared J. West
No appearances are required. At the request of the court investigator, the court continues this matter to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, so that the investigator can complete their report. - P16-15887 In the Matter of Andrew J. Bender
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to July 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall advise the court investigator of the requested report.
- P19-16532 In the Matter of Sean Manchester
No appearances are required. The 27 November 2024 first and final report of status of administration; petition to determine distribution rights; and petition to settle estate, accept waiver of accounting, and for final distribution are approved and relief is granted as prayed. Petitioner has adequately demonstrated that the creditor claim by Verizon Wireless has been satisfied.
- P21-16983 In the Matter of the Jacobson Family Trust, et al.
No appearances are required. The court has reviewed the parties’ updated joint status report and appreciates their ongoing efforts to meet and confer to resolve the matter. As requested by the parties, a review hearing is continued to August 8, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. The parties shall submit an updated joint status report no later than ten days before the review hearing date, including their meet and confer efforts as to petitioner’s objections to respondent’s second amended first account, as well as to the pre-death accounting prepared by petitioner.
- P89-10877 In the Matter of Thomas Michael Odom
No appearances are required. The thirty-fourth report of conservator of the person and estate and petition for fees for conservator and her attorney are granted as prayed. The court sets the biennial review date on March 13, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. The previous review date, March 14, 2026, is erroneous and vacated.
- PR0000451 Conservatorship of Carolee Taylor
No appearances are required. The first report of conservator of the person and estate and petition for fees for conservator and her attorney are granted as prayed. The November 13, 2026 biennial review date is confirmed.
- PR0000538 In the Matter of Tamara Cranwell
Appearances are required. The court has reviewed the update from the Public Guardian. On the court’s motion, a hearing regarding status of the sale of the conservatee’s residence and efforts to locate a less restrictive placement for conservatee in an assisted living community is set for June 27, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6.
- PR0000600 In the Matter of Sean Adam Egan
No appearances are required. The amended petition for order determining title to real property is granted as prayed.
- PR0000643 In the Matter of Thomas C. Norton
No appearances are required. The court granted counsel Harpainter’s requests for attorney fees and to be relieved on April 22, 2025. This hearing is removed from calendar.
- PR0000672 In the Matter of Earlene Tankersley
Appearances are required. Before the court is the December 17, 2024 petition to administer the estate by the public administrator. Gabrielle Massey and Tiffanie Bond shall show cause why the February 7, 2025 cross-petition by Ms. Massey and the February 19, 2025 cross-petition by Ms. Bond should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute the same. Additionally, Tiffanie Bond shall show cause for her failure to appear as required on April 4, 2025.
The court has reviewed the April 29, 2025 declaration from the Public Administrator indicated that Ms. Massey wishes to pursue her petition. If Ms. Massey and/or Ms. Bond intend to proceed, a future hearing date shall be set by which each petitioner shall ensure compliance with all procedural requirements for their petition(s) including notice to all required parties (including the Attorney General given the potential charitable devise), service, publication, and lodging of the original will. In addition, if a cross-petition will continue, and the alleged will is subject to contest, any objector, including the public administrator, must comply with the objection and notice requirements of Probate Code section 8250, et seq.
- PR0000739 In the Matter of Sylvester Robinson
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the petition to administer estate is continued to July 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. The court notes the petition is presently missing proof of publication, see Probate Code 8121, a signed statement of duties and liabilities, see Probate Code 8404, and a completed proof of service. See Probate Code 8110. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date and file with the court the outstanding items.
April 25, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P07-14542 In the Matter of Michael A. Powers, et al.
No appearances are required. The court continues this case to June 20, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The 16th account and report from trustee shall be filed no later than May 23, 2025. Trustee shall provide notice of the continued hearing.
- P19-16469 In the Matter of Roland Vieira
No appearances are required. The court continues this case to June 20, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court has not received the investigation review report. The court investigator shall file the investigation review report no later than June 6, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice to the court investigator.
- PR0000342 In the Matter of the Estate of Luther Taylor
No appearances are required. The petition for an order confirming expenses of administration and application of remaining proceeds from sale in regard to priority of debts is granted as set forth in the amended prayer for relief, item 2. See Petitioner’s Reply at 9:11-14. The court finds good cause for the order under applicable law and is not persuaded by any of the arguments to the contrary by Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC.
- PR0000469 In the Matter of Sandra Eileen Gilbert
No appearances are required. The first and final report of status of administration and petition for settlement of estate, approval of account, allowance of statutory compensation and final distribution is granted as prayed.
- PR0000478 Conservatorship of Mark. F. Miller
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to June 20, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigator shall file the investigation review report no later than June 6, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice to the court investigator.
- PR0000484 Conservatorship of Raymond Poquette
No appearances are required. The petitioner for attorney fees is granted as prayed.
- PR0000493 In the Matter of Walter T. Branson
No appearances are required. The motion by counsel Haas to be relieved from representing Ms. Branson is granted effective filing of a proof of service on the client.
- PR0000664 In the Matter of the Dennis W. Babson 2000 Trust
No appearances are required. A request for dismissal with prejudice has been entered as requested.
- PR0000665 In the Matter of Faith and Hope Cline
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation report. On its own motion, the court continues this matter for receipt of the report to June 20, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The clerk shall provide notice to the court investigator.
- PR0000668 In the Matter of Sage Marie Davis Da Rosa
Appearances are required. The petition is granted in part as follows: The 401 K proceeds totaling $70,000 shall be placed in a beneficiary account within 5 court days and proof of the same filed within 10 court days. The request for reimbursement is granted. The request for prospective support is denied. No good cause has been demonstrated for support for an indefinite period in indeterminate amounts. The court is favorably inclined to authorize investment of funds in a 529 plan so long as it is advised of a reasonable, determinate amount. - PR0000725 In the Matter of Deborah Pyle
No appearances are required. The petition is granted as prayed.
- PR0000728 In the Matter of John Bruce Bianchi
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the petition to administer estate is continued to June 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. No original will was filed with the court as required. See Local Rule 8.06. Additionally, it is unclear why the named executors in the will are unavailable to administer the estate. Lastly, bond seemingly is not waived under the will unless one of the named executors is appointed. Petitioner shall submit a supplemental declaration addressing these issues no later than 10 court days prior to the next hearing.
- PR0000733 In the Matter of Lou J. Schiavone
Appearances are not required. The court grants the unopposed petition to compel information and accounting by trustee in part, namely, requests for relief 1.c. (assets), 1.d. (compensation) and 2 (accounting). The accounting and information requested shall be filed and served no later than June 26, 2025. A hearing regarding the same is set for July 25, 2025. The court denies, without prejudice, requests 1.a. (financial records) and 1.b. (real property records). The moving party shall give notice.
- PR0000734 Estate of Virginia Bauch
No appearances are required. The petition is granted as prayed.
- PR0000735 In the Matter of Esther L. Morales
No appearances are required. The trustee’s petition for termination is granted as prayed.
- PR0000737 In the Matter of Benny Lee Riding
No appearances are required. The petition is granted as prayed.
April 18, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- PR0000614 In the Matter of Nyialong Steve Yang
No appearances are authorized on April 18, 2025. On the court’s motion, this matter is continued to Tuesday, April 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.No appearances are required on April 22, 2025. The amended petition to administer the estate of Nyialong Steve Yang is granted as prayed.
- PR0000643 In the Matter of Thomas C. Norton
No appearances are authorized on April 18, 2025. On the court’s motion, this matter is continued to Tuesday, April 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.No appearances are required on April 22, 2025. The petition for the allowance of court appointed attorney fees and to be relieved as counsel are granted as prayed.
- PR0000736 In the Matter of Rollin Wayne Shively
No appearances are authorized on April 18, 2025. On the court’s motion, this matter is continued to Tuesday, April 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.No appearances are required on April 22, 2025. The court continues this matter to May 30, 2025, to permit the petitioner additional time to provide notice to Rhonda Ceritelli. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued date.
April 11, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P17-16181 In the Matter of Andrew Joseph Graybill
Appearances are required. Conservator shall clarify when he intends to return to Nevada County, and why a change of venue to Yuba County would not be in the best interest of the conservatee.
- P22-16995 In the Matter of Phyllis Graham
No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the review hearing is continued to May 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. An order to show cause hearing is set for the same date and time for Conservators Shelley Gutierrez and Phillip Graham to show cause for their failure to file a final accounting as ordered by the court on February 28, 2025.
- P94-11921 In the Matter of Korie Alison Rekers, et al.
No appearances are required. The accounting and requested fees are approved as prayed.
- PR0000572 In the Matter of Arthur Carl Bern
No appearances are required. The petition for settlement of first and final account and final distribution and allowance of statutory compensation to attorney is granted as prayed.
- PR0000580 In the Matter of Christopher Levas
No appearances are required. The court has received the request for dismissal and the proposed order approving trustee’s first account. The court will approve the order based on the settlement of the parties.
- PR0000634 Estate of Alan Bernard
No appearances are required. Petitioner has submitted an amended proof of service but it does not indicate that notice of the continued date was provided. Additionally, a corrected or new DE-120 was not filed. As such, the court continues this matter to May 30, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioner shall ensure the petition, proposed order and notice of hearing are served on all required parties and shall submit a proof of service (DE-120) indicating the same. Petitioner is referred to the Nevada County Superior Court’s Self-Help Center for information if needed.
- PR0000655 In the Matter of Willah Brave Barlow Dunwody
Appearances are required. Counsel James shall show cause for her failure to appear on February 28, 2025. Additionally, the court still needs an update on the status of the final distribution from Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 22STPB11927 as well as proof that a court-blocked blocked account has been opened.
- PR0000667 In the Matter of Cynthia E. Dell
Appearances are required. The parties shall meet, confer, and be prepared to select a hearing date on the petition for instructions. Additionally, the parties shall advise if this matter is related to PR0000716 - In the Matter of William J. Hemby.
- PR0000690 In the Matter of Fred G. Dean-Turner
No appearances are required. The court on its own motion continues this matter to May 23, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court appoints Valerie Logsdon Esq., to represent proposed conservatee. The clerk shall provide notice to Ms. Logsdon.
- PR0000716 In the Matter of William J. Hemby
Appearances are required. The court notes that a copy of the will has not been filed which is required by Local Rule 8.06. Moreover, it is unclear whether the will is self-proving or whether there is proof of a subscribing witness. Additionally, petitioner shall advise if this matter is related to PR0000667- In the Matter of Cynthia E. Dell. The petition will be continued for hearing to another date to be announced.
- PR0000729 In the Matter of Elberta Jean Cain
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
- PR0000732 In the Matter of Virginia Logan Umstead-Jones
No appearances are required. The petition to administer the estate is granted as prayed.
April 4, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P09-14943 In the Matter of SEAN KRULISKY
Appearances are required. On January 31, 2025, conservators were ordered to file a written update with respect to the conservatorship by March 28, 2025. No update has been filed with the court. The conservators shall explain their failure to follow the court’s prior order, as well as whether the conservatorship will continue, transfer to Missouri or terminate.
- P11-15177 In the Matter of PHILLIP T KRULISKY
Appearances are required. On January 31, 2025, conservators were ordered to file a written update with respect to the conservatorship by March 28, 2025. No update has been filed with the court. The conservators shall explain their failure to follow the court’s prior order, as well as whether the conservatorship will continue or terminate.
- P15-15866 In the Matter of CHRISTIAN VIXIE
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservator is acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for February 12, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee for this biennial review is waived.
- PR0000195 In the Matter of ALEKSEI D. DIX
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservator is acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for April 2, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee for this annual review is waived.
- PR0000425 Estate of HANS J. LILLER
No appearances are required. The petition for final distribution is granted as prayed.
- PR0000596 In the Matter of GABRIEL KULP
No appearances are required. The petition for instructions is granted as prayed.
- PR0000672 In the Matter of EARLENE TANKERSLEY
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to select dates for hearing on the competing petitions to administer the estate of Earlene Tankersley. Ms. Bond shall immediately give notice to the Attorney General of her petition to administer as it appears to involve a devise for charitable purposes. See Probate Code section 8111. The court notes an error in the February 7, 2025 minutes, which shall be corrected. The court deferred taking action on Ms. Massey’s petition for letters of administration filed on February 7, 2025. Ms. Massey shall confirm whether that petition has been withdrawn in light of the February 19, 2025, petition by Ms. Bond.
- PR0000688 In the Matter of JAMES D. BRUMM
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of mediation and selection of hearing date(s) if necessary.
- PR0000719 In the Matter of JEFFREY STEPHENSON
No appearances are required. The court is favorably inclined to grant the petition to appoint successor conservator. However, the court is not in receipt of the court investigator’s report. The court continues this matter to May 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 for receipt of report. The clerk shall provide notice to Quest Investigative Services.
- PR0000721 In the Matter of BRISAN MICHAEL LEE BANKS
No appearances are required. The petition to administer estate is granted as prayed.
- PR0000724 In the Matter of CARTER E. REDDING, JR.
No appearances are required. The petition to administer estate is granted as prayed.
- PR0000726 In the Matter of RICHARD SAMUEL BARTHOLOMEW
Appearances are required. There are apparently competing petitions to administer. The court is not in receipt of petitioner Lipski-Mosher’s notice or proof of service (DE-121), proof of publication, or signed duties and liabilities (DE-147). As such, it appears that this petition is incomplete. The parties shall update the court on the current status of their requested petitions and be prepared to set a hearing.
March 28, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- P17-16154 In the Matter of Dawn Delange
Appearances are required by conservators and counsel for conservatee. The court has reviewed the March 14, 2025, report of counsel for the conservatee including the report that conservatee has stabilized. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The court, on its own motion, advances biennial review previously set for January 8, 2027, to January 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. Conservators and/or counsel for conservatee shall immediately advise the court if conservatee’s condition deteriorates and further powers are necessary to manage the same. A copy of the minutes shall be served on the court investigator, conservator and counsel for conservatee.
- P17-16234 In the Matter of Joseph Ruscica
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservators are acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for February 5, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court investigation fee for this biennial review is waived.
- P19-16493 In the Matter of Simon Cruickshank, et al.
No appearances are required. The court approves the seventh accounting and report of the Thelma P. Cruikshank Revocable Trust and all acts of Simon Cruikshank as trustee.
- P21-16907 In the Matter of Susan E. Walima
No appearances are required. The conservatorship of the person shall continue. The conservatorship still appears to be warranted. The conservators are acting in the best interests of the conservatee regarding the conservatee's placement and quality of care, including physical and mental treatment. The next biennial review is set for February 5, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. It appears that the conservatee’s estate has sufficient assets for purposes of the court investigator assessment, which shall be paid by the estate forthwith. A proposed order shall be submitted by the investigator.
- PR0000202 In the Matter of Catherine Mendenhall
No appearances are required. The petition for final distribution on approval of account and for payment of administrator and attorney fees is granted as prayed.
- PR0000326 In the Matter of Jamie Dickerson
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for purposes of annual review. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to May 30, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 for receipt of the report. The court notes that an annual accounting is overdue. Conservator Heidi Conservator shall file the same, with appropriate notice and service, within 30 days, for hearing on May 30, 2025. A copy of the minutes shall be served on conservator Heidi Dickerson and the court investigator.
- PR0000426 In the Matter of Renee S. Marshall
No appearances are required. The court has not received the investigation review report for purposes of annual review. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to June 6, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 for receipt of the report. The court notes that an annual accounting is overdue. Conservator Steven Marshall shall file the same, with appropriate notice and service, within 30 days, for hearing on June 6, 2025. A copy of the minutes shall be served on conservator Steven Marshall and the court investigator.
- PR0000439 Estate of Kathleen Alexander
Appearances are required. All powers of trustee Lynn Anthony are suspended except as noted herein. Trustee Anthony is specifically prohibited from taking any action in connection with the disposition of any trust asset or liability. Trustee Anthony shall file and serve the accounting submitted as part of her March 24, 2025, declaration on all required parties along with a notice of hearing. A hearing is now calendared for May 1, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Petitioner Worth shall file her position regarding the accounting no later than 10 court days prior to the hearing. The February 7, 2025, order to show cause regarding removal of trustee Anthony is continued to May 1, 2025. Trustee Anthony shall file her response to the specific contentions of petitioner Worth in Worth’s March 11, 2024 response to order to show cause no later than 10 court days prior to the hearing.
- PR0000614 In the Matter of Nyialong Steve Yang
No appearances are required. The court on its own motion continues this matter to April 18, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioner shall file a signed acknowledgment of duties (DE-147) prior to the continued court date.
- PR0000638 In the Matter of William Aguilar
No appearances are required. The court continues this matter to May 23, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to provide the parties additional time to engage in mediation. The parties are ordered to provide a joint status report regarding mediation no later than one week before the next hearing date.
- PR0000681 In the Matter of Patricia Melia Paddock
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the petition to administer estate to April 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court notes that the proof of service (DE-121) has not been completed. If service was previously effectuated, petitioner shall file proof of the same and give notice of the continued hearing date to all parties. Otherwise, petitioner shall file and serve notice of the hearing for the new date.
- PR0000722 Estate of Anthony B. Rohl
No appearances are required. The petition to administer estate is granted as prayed. Letters shall issue.
March 21, 2025 Probate Tentative Rulings
- CU0001798 Sheldon Lynn Thompson v. Christina Joy Callahan
No appearances are required. This matter was improvidently set for hearing on March 21, 2025. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued until May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, application for service by publication (if deemed appropriate), or request for dismissal not later than one week before the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- P11-15182 In the Matter of Jacquelyn Munoz
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to May 9, 2025. Conservator shall serve petition, and provide proof of the same, on all parties referenced in the petition pursuant to Prob. Code sections 2352 and 1822.
- P12-15334 In the Matter of Helen Powell
No appearances are required. The court has not received a status report from the court investigator or the conservator. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to May 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, for receipt of a report from both the investigator and conservator. A copy of the March 21, 2025 minutes as well as the court’s previous September 20, 2024 minutes shall be provided to the court investigator and conservator.
- P15-15875 In the Matter of Sharon Beatty
Appearances are required. The court has reviewed the March 12, 2025 status report of Ms. Greeninger. The parties shall update the court on the status of settlement. In the event no settlement has been reached, parties shall be prepared to inform the court on the legal issues involving the contested income tax return dispute.
- P18-16383 In the Matter of Margaret Vinther Copeland Special Needs Trust, et al.
No appearances are required. The petition for settlement of first account/report of trustee is granted as prayed. Additionally, the request to exempt future accountings is granted pursuant to Prob. Code section 2628.
- P21-16866 In the Matter of Wilhelm Disselhoff
No appearances are required. The court is in receipt of the notice of death of the conservatee. On its own motion, the court continues the review hearing to May 23, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Conservator is directed to file and serve a final accounting for hearing on the same date.
- PR0000069 In the Matter of Tracy Freeman
On the court’s motion, this matter is continued until 10:00 a.m., as part of the regular law and motion calendar.
Nicole Medina and Mitchell Freeman’s unopposed January 28, 2025, motion to intervene in the probate action (PR0000069) is granted. These individuals claim an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action and they are so situated that the disposition of the action may impair or impede their ability to protect that interest. See Code of Civil Procedure section 387(d)(1).
Medina and Freeman’s January 28, 2025, motion to expunge lis pendens is granted.
“A lis pendens is a recorded document giving constructive notice that an action has been filed affecting title to or right to possession of the real property described in the notice.” Kirkeby v. Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal.4th 642, 647.
“The Supreme Court outlined the law governing the statutory scheme pertaining to the recording of a lis pendens and the procedure applicable to expunging an improperly recorded notice in Kirkeby v. Superior Court of Orange County (2004) 33 Cal.4th 642, 647[.]” Campbell v. Superior Court (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 904, 911.
“A lis pendens may be filed by any party in an action who asserts a ‘real property claim.’ Code of Civ. Proc. § 405.20. Section 405.4 defines a ‘ “Real property claim” ’ as ‘the cause or causes of action in a pleading which would, if meritorious, affect ... title to, or the right to possession of, specific real property....’ ‘If the pleading filed by the claimant does not properly plead a real property claim, the lis pendens must be expunged upon motion under CCP 405.31.’
“Section 405.30 allows the property owner to remove an improperly recorded lis pendens by bringing a motion to expunge. There are several statutory bases for expungement of a lis pendens, including [that the] claimant's pleadings, on which the lis pendens is based, do not contain a real property claim. See § 405.31. Unlike most other motions, when a motion to expunge is brought, the burden is on the party opposing the motion to show the existence of a real property claim. See § 405.30.”
Id. at 911 (citation, footnotes, quotations and parentheses omitted).
“The Kirkeby court also discussed the law governing a trial court's determination of a motion to expunge under section 405.31 and the standard of review applicable on appeal[.]” Ibid.
“Section 405.31 provides: ‘In proceedings under this chapter, the court shall order the notice expunged if the court finds that the pleading on which the notice is based does not contain a real property claim.’ In making this determination, the court must engage in a demurrer-like analysis. ‘Rather than analyzing whether the pleading states any claim at all, as on a general demurrer, the court must undertake the more limited analysis of whether the pleading states a real property claim.’ Review ‘involves only a review of the adequacy of the pleading and normally should not involve evidence from either side, other than possibly that which may be judicially noticed as on a demurrer.’ Therefore, review of an expungement order under section 405.31 is limited to whether a real property claim has been properly pled by the claimant. ”
Ibid. (citations omitted).
Here, the underlying petition does not contain a real property claim. In summary, the operative petition alleges as follows:
This Petition arises from Nicole [Medina]'s bad-faith and unlawful distribution to herself and to her brother Mitchell [Freeman] an aggregate $1.45 million from their parents' estates without notice or court approval. eCapital had filed two Creditor's Claims against their parents' estates – the respective estates of Tracy Freeman ("Tracy Estate") and David Freeman ("David Estate") (collectively, the "Freeman Estates") relating to a spousal community debt that Tracy incurred during her life when she defaulted under her personal guaranty of the Loan (defined below) from eCapital to Tracy's business Volume Snacks, Inc. ("Volume Snacks"). Rather than restore the $1.45 million pending the resolution of eCapital's Creditor's Claims, Nicole and Mitchell spent the money so distributed, and Nicole (then serving as Personal Representative of the David Estate) baselessly rejected the Creditor's Claim filed in the David Estate. The looting, distribution, and expenditure of $1.45 million was intended as a blatant, bad-faith scheme to hinder and delay eCapital's collection of its Creditor's Claims.
12/5/24 Pet. ¶ 1.
As a result of this alleged misconduct, petitioner requests the court, among other things, for an order:
(1) requiring Nicole and Mitchell to return $1.45 million to the Tracy Estate (or alternatively, the David Estate) under Probate Code section 850, (2) for injunctive relief under Probate Code section 856 prohibiting Nicole and Mitchell from transferring, selling, or encumbering any real or personal property that they have acquired, obtained, or improved with the $1.45 million they received from the Freeman Estates.
Ibid.
Title of Medina and Freeman’s real property is not at issue in the petition. Rather, the petition alleges that Medina/Freeman received funds unlawfully and seeks to enjoin Medina and Freeman from disposing of any real property they have acquired, obtained or improved with those funds. “[A] claim that seeks an interest in real property merely for the purpose of securing a money damage judgment does not support the recording of a lis pendens.” Campbell, 132 Cal.App.4th at 912 (and cases cited therein). Petitioner’s allegations do not affect title or possession of the real property at issue. See Urez Corp. v. Superior Court (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 1141, 1149; La Paglia v. Superior Court (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 1322, 1325, 1327.
To the extent that a result to the contrary would be possible under either Okuda v. Superior Court (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 135, 141 (cited by petitioner) or Coppinger v. Superior Court (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 883, 891, the court finds these cases to be unpersuasive and declines to follow them. See Campbell, 132 Cal.App.4th at 918–919. (“We agree with Urez and the cases that follow it that to allow a party to record a lis pendens in a case in which the party seeks only “to freeze the real property as a res from which to satisfy a money judgment” …, is not consistent with the history and purpose of the lis pendens statutes and conclude that the Urez line of cases is more consistent with the history and purpose of the lis pendens statutes than are Coppinger and Okuda.”).
Moreover, Newell v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2024) 107 Cal.App.5th 728, is readily distinguishable and does not compel a result to the contrary. See Newell, 107 Cal. App. 5th at 737 (“[I]f [trustee] Rollins fails to establish by clear and convincing evidence [decedent] Arthur's donative transfer to her was not the product of fraud or undue influence, the court may remove Rollins as trustee. The court would have to designate a new trustee of the trust, who would then be entitled to hold title to the Van Nuys property in his or her name as successor trustee. In that event, [the instant] petition would change the name of the titleholder.”)(italics added).
In sum, the lis pendens recorded against the parcels of real property for Medina and Freeman are expunged.
There is a split of authority in the state as to whether a claim that seeks an interest in real property merely for the purpose of securing a money damage judgment supports the recording of a lis pendens. See Campbell v. Superior Court, 132 Cal.App.4th at 912 (citing majority and minority positions). The 1992 amendments to the lis pendens statutes took no position regarding this issue and left it to future judicial development. Id. at 915-916. The court finds that petitioner acted with substantial justification in opposing the motion based on a good faith theory supported by existing law, including Okuda, and that it would be unjust to impose an award of attorney’s fees and costs under these circumstances. The court denies Medina and Freeman’s request for attorney’s fees and costs.
- PR0000207 In the Matter of Marcia Bauer
Appearances are required by Administrator Morgan Rains regarding petitioner Carol Nimick’s petition for a status report regarding administration of the estate and for an order to show cause regarding why a petition for final distribution should not be filed. Administrator Rains shall be prepared to address questions (a) through (e) of the petition at p. 4, line 24, to p. 5, line, 9. The administrator shall also address the question of when a petition for final distribution shall be filed.
- PR0000597 In the Matter of Joshua Christian Chamberlain Special Needs Trust #2
No appearances are required. The court has received the request for dismissal filed by petitioner and trustee; the dismissal has been entered as requested.
- PR0000635 In the Matter of Sharri-Anne Renea Adams
Appearances are required by counsel for the conservator and conservatee. The amended petition for appointment of a probate conservator of the person is granted as prayed. Counsel shall confirm that appropriate orders have been lodged in connection with the amended petition.
- PR0000659 In the Matter of Ian Fredrick Ayton
Appearances are not required. Conservatorship of the person and estate is granted as prayed. Julie Yates and Janet Mourning shall serve as the conservators. Letters shall issue.
- PR0000676 In the Matter of Ralph Berger
No appearances are required. The petition for an order confirming successor trustee and trust assets is granted in part, namely prayers for relief one through four related to the validity of the trust, its amendments and its trustee.
The court denies the fifth request for relief requesting a declaration that the subject property, i.e., 2440 S. Hacienda Boulevard, unit 225, Hacienda Heights, California, is subject to the management and control of the trustee.
“It is well established that if two specific requirements are met, real property may be made part of a trust's assets without a separate deed transferring property to the trust.” Ukkestad v. RBS Asset Finance, Inc. (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 156, 160, citing Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 943, 947–950.
“The first requirement is that the owner of real property is the settlor creating the trust with himself or herself as the trustee.” Ibid. That requirement is satisfied here. Decedents/settlors Richard and Bertha Berger were owners of the subject property and created a trust naming themselves as co-trustees.
“Second, because a conveyance of real property is at issue, the other requirement for transferring real property to a trust is compliance with the statute of frauds.” Ibid.. citing Heggstad, 16 Cal.App.4th at 948. “Specifically, the statute of frauds in Probate Code section 15206 states: ‘A trust in relation to real property is not valid unless evidenced ...: [¶] (a) By a written instrument signed by the trustee .... [¶] (b) By a written instrument conveying the trust property signed by the settlor .... [¶] (c) By operation of law.’ ” Id. at 161 (italics added). That requirement is not satisfied here by sufficient, credible evidence. Neither the trust itself (Ex. L to Petition), the description of Berger Trust Property as part of the trust (Ex. M), nor the assignment of deed of trust (Ex. J) expressly convey or reasonably can be construed to convey the subject property itself to the trust. “Although [petitioner’s declaration] related the [settlors’ purported beliefs or] intent that [the subject property] was to be [part of] the trust property, the statute of frauds “forbids the creation of an express trust in real property by verbal declaration of the owner.” Osswald v. Anderson (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 812, 818.
- PR0000692 In the Matter of Terry McGowan
No appearances are required. The petition for an order approving modification of trust terms under Prob. Code section 15403 is granted as prayed.
- PR0000710 In the Matter of Miller Ernest Harper
No appearances are required. The court notes there is no original will or proof of publication submitted by petitioner. Petitioner shall file the same prior to next hearing date. Additionally, petitioner shall clarify the status of George Sill; specifically, is he the named executor (as suggested by the will) or an alternate executor? On its own motion, the Court continues this matter to May 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 for further hearing on the petition. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued court date.
- PR0000712 In the Matter of Zane Davis
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to May 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Petitioners shall file a declaration that indicates whether they are seeking full or limited authority to administer under the Independent Administration of Estates Act, question 2.c. of the petition for probate (form DE-111). There is no proof that the petition has been served and that notice of the hearing has been provided as required by Probate Code sections 8100 and 8110. Petitioners shall serve and provide notice to each heir, devisee, executor and alternate executor named in any will as required. Finally, Petitioners shall file an executed duties and liabilities of personal representative (form DE-147). The above referenced items shall be completed no later than one week prior to next court date. Petitioners shall give notice of the continued hearing date to all required parties.
- PR0000714 In the Matter of Dylan Melanson
No appearance is required. The court, on its own motion, appoints Katherine Lenore, Esq., to represent conservatee. Additionally, the court is not in receipt of a report from Alta Regional Center as required by Prob. Code section 1827.5 or from Quest Intelligence as required by Prob. Code section 1826. On its own motion, the court continues this matter to May 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, for receipt of the reports and update from counsel. A copy of the minute order shall be served by the clerk on Alta Regional Center, Quest Intelligence, and counsel for the conservatee.
These are the Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at OA@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309 by 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court. See California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.
Personal appearances are permitted. You may also appear via video by arranging a remote appearance at the time notice of request for oral argument.
Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court does not provide court reporters for case management conferences. Any litigant who wants a record of a case management conference must arrange for the presence of a court reporter at his or her expense. See Local Rule 10.00.3 B.
June 30, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002112 Discover Bank vs. Susan Gisler
Appearances are required. Counsel shall show cause for their failure to appear as required on April 25, 2025. Additionally, the court seeks an update regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002305 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. Brianna C Sawdey
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002307 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. Darren Pool
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002317 Capital One N.A. vs. Dawsi L Rohl
No appearances are required. Based on the stipulation of the parties, this matter is dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CL0002321 Capital One N.A. vs. Douglas S Mcintosh
No appearances are required. Based on the stipulation of the parties, this matter is dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CL0002610 Charly Hodge vs. Doe Defendant
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001524 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs. JERAD G HIOKI, an individual
No appearance is required. On the court’s own motion, the case management conference is continued to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. An order to show cause hearing is set for the same date for plaintiff to show cause why it has not filed a proof of service, an application to serve by publication (if deemed appropriate), or a request for dismissal as previously ordered and why it should not be sanctioned for failing to file a case management conference statement. Plaintiff shall give notice of the continued case management conference. - CU0001664 CARLA MARKEETA JEFFERSON, an individual et al vs. HEATING-COOLING SERVICE CO, a sole proprietorship et al
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 10-day jury trial.
Trial: April 21, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: April 10, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: March 30, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001691 Scott Weidert vs. HEARTWOOD NEVADA CITY, LLC, a California limited liability company et al
No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for October 3, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001850 Davey, Raymond v. Close Associates
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001854 Wesco Distribution, Inc., a Delaware corporation vs. Sustainable Energy Group, Inc., a California corporation et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant Stokes no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Additionally, defendants Sustainable Energy Group, Inc., and Brian Thomas Gardner shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001860 Matthew Vickers vs. Ariana Vickers
No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for October 3, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001970 Kevin Snider vs. Gerald James Demontmollin
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001973 Patricia Healey v USAA Casualty Insurance Company
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to January 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit arbitration to be completed.
- CU0001975 THOMAS JAMES CARPENTER vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service as no proof of service has been filed with the court. Additionally, defendant shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001977 Pacific Bell Telephone Company vs. Grass Valley Courtyard Suites, LLC
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day court trial.
Trial: March 10, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: February 27, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: February 23, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001978 BRIDGETT HIGGINBOTHAM vs. PACIFIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE et al
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001994 Peter Baga vs. Clifford Christopher Webb et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001995 John Deere Construction & Forestry Company vs. Chunyu Ou et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 29, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
June 23, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002571 State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. vs. Janet Lee Duron
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CL0002584 Geico General Ins. Co. vs. Sebastian Deleon-Mariscal, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001540 Bradley Dorigo, et al. vs. County of Nevada
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, after adjudication of a pending motion.
- CU0001652 Pawnee Leasing Corporation vs. 1ST Choice R & R LLC, et al.
Appearances are required. Paul Arnold shall show cause why the answer filed by First Choice R&R, LLC, should not be stricken given that it was not filed by counsel.
- CU0001697 County of Nevada vs. Wild Earth Property LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court appointed receiver shall provide a written status report no later than 2 weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Petitioner shall provide notice of the continued date.
- CU0001718 Matthew Hillock vs. Will Kazen
No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for September 19, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001962 Lloyd Leonard Pudiwitr, et al. vs. Grass Valley Courtyard Suites, LLC
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 10-day court trial.
Trial: March 10, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: February 27, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: February 23, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
June 16, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0000572 Gerry Reis v. Roger Reis
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated. The pending order to show cause issued to Gerry Reis is discharged in the interest of justice. - CL0001259 Thomas Deal v. Fred Gerkensmeyer, et al.
On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. It is unclear whether this matter is at issue. The June 13, 2024, first amended complaint (FAC) is the operative complaint; the second amended complaint was stricken. A June 13, 2024 proof of service by mail has been filed reflecting mail service of the FAC on both defendants. The court is not aware of an answer by defendant Gerkensmeyer as to the FAC. Mail service is likely inappropriate for defendant Regional Housing Authority given there is no evidence that it was previously served with a copy of the summons and complaint. Plaintiff shall properly serve the summons and FAC upon defendant Regional Housing Authority or a request for dismissal of this defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Defendant Gerkensmeyer shall address the issue of a responsive pleading to the FAC no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CL0002244 Discover Bank vs. Lorri Pezzola
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002554 The Haas Law Corporation vs. Morgan Branson
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0000410 Taylor Strunk v. Stagecoach Motel, et al.
Appearances are required. The court seeks an update from the parties regarding the status of dismissal.
- CU0000663 Brian Kelley, et al. vs. Rebecca Aycock, et al.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CU0001024 Walter Nicholas, et al. vs. FCA US, LLC
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant shall file a judgment of dismissal prior to the continued case management date.
- CU0001290 John Doe 1 , et al. vs. Erica's Playhouse , et al.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial.
Trial: March 3, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: February 20, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: February 9, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001386 Rise Grass Valley, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Nevada County, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 after adjudication of the standing issue.
- CU0001640 Evan Benn, et al. vs. Diamond P Properties, LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 7, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff and defendant Collins Property Management shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to file timely case management conference statements as previously ordered by this court. Plaintiff shall provide notice of the continued case management date.
- CU0001643 Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC vs. Ashley Parker, et al.
Appearances are required. Brian S. Thomley, Esq., shall show cause why plaintiff should not be sanctioned or the action against Ashley Parker dismissed for failing to file a request for default or a request for dismissal as to that defendant as ordered on March 3, 2025. Additionally, plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to file a timely case management conference statement prior to the April 21, 2025 case management conference hearing date.
- CU0001649 Debbie Havener vs. Shawna Sullivan, et al.
Appearances are required. Edward A. Smith show cause why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned or this case dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendant Shawna Sullivan as ordered by the court on March 3, 2025.
- CU0001715 William Neil v. County of Nevada, et. al.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 2-day court trial.
Trial: January 6, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: December 26, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: December 15, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001750 McKellar Tree Serv. & Logging, Inc. vs. Blue Lead Gold Mining, LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for September 12, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001762 William Dean Ferreira vs. Stephanie Diane Stone-Ferreira , et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant Stephanie Stone no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001796 Sonya Sokolow v. Environmental Health Director
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff’s proof of service filed March 28, 2025 appears defective in that the summons and complaint were not served on defendant. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff is referred to the Nevada County Superior Court’s Self-Help Center for information if needed.
- CU0001811 Auto Fraud Legal Center LLP vs. Dalton Workman
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failure to file a request for default or a request for dismissal of defendant as ordered by the court on March 24, 2025.
- CU0001842 Charles Eugene Murdock vs. Jodi Michelle Andrews
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant Auburn Ravine Terrace no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall provide notice of the continued case management date.
- CU0001844 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association vs. Tim Radford , et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendants as ordered by this court on April 21, 2025. Additionally, Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to file timely case management conference statements as previously ordered by this court. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001848 Pamela Bell vs. Dan Powers, et al.
No appearances are required. Plaintiff and defendants have conflicting information in their case management statements about the likelihood of resolution in this matter. The court does not have a proof of service of the summons and complaint for either defendant. On the court’s own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall provide notice of the continued case management date.
- CU0001849 Gregory Thrush vs. Jose Antonio Valdovinos
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 8-day court trial.
Trial: March 3, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: February 20, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: February 9, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001884 Ryan Christopher Crandell, v. Serbian Mafia, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failure to effectuate service on defendants as ordered by this court on April 25, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause. - CU0001956 Bank of America, N.A. vs. Benny Riding
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001959 Grace Vogel vs. Arrianna Lilian Sandoval , et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU21-085893 Tom Amesbury, et al. vs. Barbara Heger, et al.
No appearances required. The court continues the case management conference to September 22, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. No later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference the parties shall provide the court with the status of arbitration.
June 9, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002108 Dorton Drywall, et al. vs. James Clarke, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. A general denial was filed on April 29, 2025 by defendants. However, it is unclear whether this has been executed by both defendants. Defendants shall clarify the same in their next case management conference statement. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CL0002278 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Vikki Vincenzi
Appearances are required. Donald Sherrill shall show cause, why he should not be sanctioned or this case dismissed for failing to file a request for default or a request for dismissal of defendant as ordered on March 3, 2025.
- CL0002308 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. Brianna Sawdey
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002395 Discover Bank vs. Natalie Bowen
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 25, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in Department 6. Defendant Bowen shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0000191 David Elliott, et al. v. Ellen Nevarez, et al.
No appearances are required. The court has received the requests for dismissal. The complaint and cross-complaint have been dismissed with prejudice.
- CU0000385 Derek Olsen, et al. v. David Sugalski, et al.
Appearances are required. The parties shall update the court on the status of this case including resolution and whether any final judgments need be presented. Additionally, plaintiff shall update the court on defendant Wild Acorns Learning Village and whether a default will be sought as to this defendant.
- CU0001162 Miles Hagood vs. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.Additionally, Counsel Michael Rosenstein shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to appear as ordered on April 7, 2025.
- CU0001249 Tina Warner v. Jennie Pope
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. - CU0001307 Rick Ewald vs. Gary Liardon, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff indicates in his case management conference statement that defendants Michael Macritchie and Crescendo Capital have been served; however, the court has been unable to locate a proof of service for either defendant. Plaintiff shall address the same. Additionally, plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal for the remaining defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff to provide notice of continued case management conference.
- CU0001354 Cynthia Gustafson vs. Safeway Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff indicates in their case management statement they have identified “Store Manager 1”. Plaintiff shall amend their filing to identify this party and shall file a proof of service regarding the same no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall give notice of the continued case management conference date.
- CU0001444 Janet Littlefield, et al. vs. Homecraft Building & Design, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 25, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001544 Caitlin Peters vs. Cara Krpalek, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s proof of service for defendant Jiri Krpalek, via Cara Krpalek. However, the service on defendant Jiri Krpalek appears to be defective. The proof of service does not indicate that a copy of the summons and complaint was mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid to defendant Krpalek at the residence where the copy of the summons and complaint were left, as required by Code Civ. Proc. 415.20. Plaintiff shall either file an amended proof of service or effectuate service in compliance with the statutory requirements no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001576 Michael Berson, et al. v. Daniel Martin, DDS, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court is still not in receipt of a proof of service for defendant Daniel C. Martin, DDS Dental Corporation, d/b/a Tahoe Oral Surgery and Implant Center. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Daniel C. Martin, DDS Dental Corporation, d/b/a Tahoe Oral Surgery and Implant Center, no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall give notice of the continued case management conference date.Additionally, plaintiff failed to timely file a case management conference statement and is admonished that failure to file a future case management conference statement may result in sanctions.
- CU0001651 Joseph Sacks vs. Navy Federal Credit Union
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union shall file a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001738 Nationstar Mortgage LLC vs. The Testate and Intestate Successors of Gilbert J. Vega, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001938 U.S. Bank National Assoc. vs. Joseph Miller, DMD, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001940 Christopher Gulick, et al. vs. Stephen Halverson
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiffs shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001945 Jaymon Campbell, v. Jersey Mike's Subs, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit time for the filing of any responsive pleading.
- CU0001947 Jean Marie Se'epa Barbee vs. Lisa Louise Sperling
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001955 Kathryn Haynes, et al. vs. Volker Schrezenmeier, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court has not received a proof of service for defendant Volkar Construction and Design. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Additionally, Defendant Volker Schrezenmeier shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- TCU22-8066 Theodore Lachowicz, et al. vs. Mark Tanner Construction, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Blake Hoffman, dba Blake Hoffman Wood Floors, shall file a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint filed April 29, 2025, or plaintiff shall request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.Additionally, prior to the next case management conference, Sierra Sage Roofing and Truckee Mountain Home Center INC., dba Mountain Home Center, shall confirm they have filed an answer to the Mark Tanner Construction Cross-Complaint.
Also, it appears to the court that Kelly Brothers Painting, Inc., filed a response after default was entered on April 26, 2023. Mark Tanner Construction and Kelly Brothers Painting, Inc., shall confirm their understanding of the status of that litigation prior to the continued court date and accordingly update the court no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
Finally, the Special Master shall submit a letter to the court 15 days prior to the continued case management conference with any updated information regarding settlement.
June 2, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002519 Discover Bank vs. Harleen Sangha
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in Department 6. Defendant Sangha shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CL0002520 Discover Bank vs. Brenda Iozzia
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in Department 6. Defendant Iozzia shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CL0002521 Bank of America, N.A. vs. Melissa Burdick
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court sets this matter for trial on August 18, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall serve the summons and complaint and give notice of the trial date as well.
- CL0002593 Fire Recovery Services vs. Robert Lowry, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Robert Lowry has filed a response but Defendant Lisa Lowry has not. Defendant Lisa Lowry shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.Additionally, no party filed timely case management conference statements. The parties are admonished that failure to file and serve a timely case management conference statement may subject the party to sanctions.
- CU0000376 Liam Moriarty v. Tahoe Club Employee Company, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Counsel Hakimi and Counsel Havey shall show cause why sanctions should not issue for failure to file a stipulation regarding expedited schedule for discovery, resolution of the class and issue of setting matter for trial as ordered by this court on May 5, 2025. Additionally, both counsel shall also show cause why sanctions should not issue for failing to file timely case management conference statements.
- CU0000991 Christopher Stormbringer v. Turning Point
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court sustained defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. Defendant shall file a judgment of dismissal prior to the continued case management date.
- CU0001323 Ryan Shirley vs. Dynasty Valley, LLC
No appearances are required. The court continued the case management conference date to September 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to provide the parties additional time to complete mediation. No later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date, the parties shall submit a joint statement on the status of mediation and/or arbitration.
- CU0001700 City of Nevada City vs. Gerald Satterfield, et al.
No appearances are required. The court confirms the June 13, 2025 hearing at 10:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001924 Robert Ponce vs. Hunt & Sons, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Hunt & Sons, Inc., shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001925 Gianna Garrett vs. Jack Laird
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.Trial is hereby set as follows: 5 day jury trial.
Trial: January 13, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 2, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: December 15, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001926 Karl Grothman, et al. vs. April Rizzi
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001927 Steven Fischer vs. McKenzie Fisher, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant McKenzie Fisher no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Additionally, Plaintiff shall clarify in his case management statement why CSAA Insurance Exchange was served but is not a named party in the First Amended Complaint as well as his intention to proceed against Arnold Goldberg. Plaintiff shall give notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001929 Indigo Kernytsky vs. Shane Alvarez
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff failed to file a timely case management conference statement and is admonished that failure to do so can result in sanctions. Defendant filed a timely case management conference statement but indicates unavailability for trial until July 2026. Defense counsel does not provide any information to support his unavailability such as his trial schedule.The parties are advised that the court will set trial dates in this case at the next court date as this case is at issue. The parties are advised to meet and confer regarding trial dates and are each ordered to submit timely and complete case management conference statements that indicate their availability within the next twelve months.
- CU0001931 Kevin Jarrell vs. Aranda Herrern-Ward, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
May 27, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002507 Discover Bank vs. Charles R Bowers
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Trial is hereby set for August 25, 2025 at 1:00 p.m. in Dept. 6. Plaintiff and the clerk shall give notice.
- CU0001653 Magic Sun Solar, Inc. vs. Shawn McCall, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
May 19, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002197 Citibank N.A. vs. Chris Lancaster
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record. - CL0002483 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. Travis M. Schlabach
No appearances are required. This matter has been removed from calendar in light of the issuance of a default judgment. - CL0002492 Discovery Engery, LLC vs. Spingola Electric, Inc.
No appearances are required. This matter has been removed from calendar in light of the issuance of a default judgment. - CU0000512 eCapital Asset Based Lending v. Nicole Medina, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0000634 Carla Marie Vieira vs. California Dept. of Transportation, et al
No appearances are required. This case appears at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 10-day jury trial.
Trial: April 7, 2026 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: March 27, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: March 16, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0000663 Brian Kelley, et al. vs. Rebecca Aycock, et al.
No appearances are required. Status regarding dismissal is set for June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CU0000928 RC Gas, LLC vs. TJ's Roadhouse of Cedar Ridge Inc., et al.
Appearances are required. The parties shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed in light of their settlement.
- CU0001683 County of Nevada vs. Michael James Taylor
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of the bankruptcy and its effect, if any, on this litigation. Additionally, Defendant Taylor failed to timely file a case management conference statement and is admonished that failure to serve a statement for future case management conferences may subject him to sanctions.
- CU0001740 Jamie Jones, et al. vs. Lena Otgonbyamba, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendants as ordered by this court on February 24, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001869 California FAIR Plan vs. Glenn David Jones, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001901 Heather Miles v. Michael Smallwood
Appearances are required. This case appears to be at issue. Plaintiff Miles indicates no answer has been filed. However, the court is in receipt of an answer from defendant Smallwood. Defendant Smallwood shall confirm whether the answer was served on plaintiff. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 3-day court trial.
Trial: February 3, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 23, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: January 12, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001902 Travis Gould vs. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated. No proof of service has been filed as to any defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly initiate steps to effectuate service.
- CU0001903 Sheree Bartol, et al. vs. Douglas A. Mcintosh
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant McIntosh shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001905 Discover Labs Inc. vs. Golden Empire Nursing & Rehab Center, L.P
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001996 In Re Theodore Schall
Appearances are required. Petitioner shall provide the court with a proposed notice that complies with Cal. Gov. Code section 66499.24. Additionally, Petitioner shall inform the court of his understanding of the publication procedure. Petitioner shall also recommend an appropriate review date to determine whether any objections have been filed.
- PR0000214 Estate of Mathew Jay Forrest
Appearances are required. Administrator Jessica Akin shall update the court on the status of the estate and whether she will be obtaining new representation.
May 12, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002198 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. Darren S Pool
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002331 United Financial Casualty Company vs. Katie Powers
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendant Powers as ordered by this court on March 17, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CL0002402 American Express National Bank vs. Andre Villa
No appearances are required. The court dismisses this matter without prejudice and retains jurisdiction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CL0002463 Progressive Select Insurance Company vs. Nichole Anderson
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0000284 Tod DuBois v Scott Fetty, et al.
No appearances are required. Plaintiff has filed the second amended complaint. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, to permit plaintiff time to serve the complaint and for defendants to respond.
- CU0000656 Riley Gault vs. Mark Steffen
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to inform the court on the status of settlement in this matter.
- CU0000943 Russell Roark vs. Stephen Cardosi, et al.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 4-day court trial.
Trial: December 9, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: November 21, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: November 17, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001181 Cynthia Hermosa vs. Adam Rayford Kilpatrick, et al.
Appearances are required. Counsel Joe Laub shall show cause why the action against defendant Garrett Warner Woodgrift should not be dismissed and/or you sanctioned for failure to serve the summons and complaint as order on September 16, 2024. The parties failed to file CMC statements and are admonished to do so henceforth.
- CU0001613 Judith and Coleman Bowen v. Town of Truckee
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001766 Tessa Hart vs. Hooper & Weaver Mortuary, Inc.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit the parties to engage in mediation.
- CU0001768 Richard Herbert Morris, III. vs. WILLIAM HAUER, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a notice of settlement and dismissal prior to the continued case management conference date. Any request for retention of jurisdiction must be made on the record by all parties or via signed stipulation by all parties. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference date.
- CU0001787 Hills, Carol Lynn v. State of California
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendant State of California as ordered by this court on March 17, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001788 Robert Tonnies v. Mark Gold
Appearances are required.
Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees is granted in part.
Preliminarily, plaintiff filed an untimely opposition that does not contain proof of service on the defendant. In the court’s discretion, the court has read and considered the opposition.
As to the merits, Welfare & Institutions Code section 15657.03 provides: “The prevailing party in an action brought under this section may be awarded court costs and attorney’s fees, if any.” (Italics added). This provision does not define “prevailing party.”
Courts interpreting similar provisions in the context of civil harassment petitions have looked to Code of Civil Procedure section 1032 to define prevailing party. See Adler v. Vaicius (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1770, 1777 (“Since [Code of Civil Procedure] section 527.6 does not define “prevailing party,” the general definition of “prevailing party” in section 1032 may be used.”); Elster v. Friedman (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1439, 1443(same).
Code of Civil Procedure section 1032(a)(4) provides: “ ‘Prevailing party’ includes ... a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered, a defendant where neither plaintiff nor defendant obtains any relief, and a defendant as against those plaintiffs who do not recover any relief against that defendant.” Any award of attorney’s fees is discretionary. See Krug v. Maschmeier (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 796, 802 (“decision whether to award attorney fees to a prevailing party—plaintiff or defendant—under section 527.6(i) is a matter committed to the discretion of the trial court.”).
“Courts construing statutes that contain attorney fees provisions that do not define the term ‘prevailing party,’ . . . have adopted th[e] practical approach to determine the recoverability of attorney fees in pretrial voluntary dismissal cases.” Castro v. Superior Court (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1010, 1020. “Under the practical approach, the court determines the prevailing party by analyzing which party realized its litigation objectives.” Id. at 1019; see, e.g., Santisas v. Goodin (1998) 17 Cal.4th 599, 614-23.
In the present case, the action was voluntarily dismissed by petitioner after respondent filed a detailed factual response in the companion case, CU0001791. The court concludes that respondent was the prevailing party that realized their litigation objectives.
Thus, the motion for attorney’s fees is granted. Reasonable fees are $1,837.50 (6.125 hours at $300.00 per hour).
Appearances are required.
Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees is granted in part.
Preliminarily, plaintiff filed an untimely opposition that does not contain proof of service on the defendant. In the court’s discretion, the court has read and considered the opposition.
As to the merits, Welfare & Institutions Code section 15657.03 provides: “The prevailing party in an action brought under this section may be awarded court costs and attorney’s fees, if any.” (Italics added). This provision does not define “prevailing party.”
Courts interpreting similar provisions in the context of civil harassment petitions have looked to Code of Civil Procedure section 1032 to define prevailing party. See Adler v. Vaicius (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1770, 1777 (“Since [Code of Civil Procedure] section 527.6 does not define “prevailing party,” the general definition of “prevailing party” in section 1032 may be used.”); Elster v. Friedman (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1439, 1443(same).
Code of Civil Procedure section 1032(a)(4) provides: “ ‘Prevailing party’ includes ... a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered, a defendant where neither plaintiff nor defendant obtains any relief, and a defendant as against those plaintiffs who do not recover any relief against that defendant.” Any award of attorney’s fees is discretionary. See Krug v. Maschmeier (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 796, 802 (“decision whether to award attorney fees to a prevailing party—plaintiff or defendant—under section 527.6(i) is a matter committed to the discretion of the trial court.”).
“Courts construing statutes that contain attorney fees provisions that do not define the term ‘prevailing party,’ . . . have adopted th[e] practical approach to determine the recoverability of attorney fees in pretrial voluntary dismissal cases.” Castro v. Superior Court (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1010, 1020. “Under the practical approach, the court determines the prevailing party by analyzing which party realized its litigation objectives.” Id. at 1019; see, e.g., Santisas v. Goodin (1998) 17 Cal.4th 599, 614-23.
In the present case, the action was voluntarily dismissed by petitioner after respondent filed a detailed factual response. The court concludes that respondent was the prevailing party that realized its litigation objectives.
Thus, the motion for attorney’s fees is granted. Reasonable fees are $1,837.50 (6.125 hours at $300.00 per hour).
- CU0001794 PHH Mortgage Corporation vs. Brenda Marie Durtschi, et al.
No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for August 1, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001795 Krissa Connelley vs. Todd Tuggle, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Cross-Complainants Tuggles shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to identify and serve any desired “Roes 1 through 50” as ordered by this court on March 17, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001798 Sheldon Lynn Thompson v. Christina Joy Callahan
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendant Callahan as ordered by this court on March 21, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001845 Mark Gold, et al. vs. Robert A. Tonnies, et al.
Appearances are required. The court is inclined to set a default prove up hearing for August 15, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001891 Ghanshyam Pokal et al vs. Hardik A. Patel et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001892 Kara Reyes vs. Greg Zaller
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 4-day court trial.
Trial: February 3, 2026 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 23, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: January 12, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001899 Fowler Center, LLC vs. City of Grass Valley, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to August 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Cross-Complainant City shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Cross-Defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001922 David Reeves vs. Wesley Meigs
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 4-day court trial.
Trial: February 24, 2026 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: February 13, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: February 2, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
May 5, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0001352 Rocky Top Rentals, LLC vs. Maureen Elizabeth Laffey, et al.
Appearances are required. Plaintiff has served defendant Laffey, but has again failed to serve the summons and complaint on defendant Cunningham. Moreover, there is no reference to defendant Cunningham in plaintiff’s case management conference statement. Jonathan Cahill shall show cause why the matter against defendant Cunningham should not be dismissed for failure to serve the summons and complaint as previously ordered by this court. Defendant Laffey shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference. - CL0001803 Ferguson Enterprises, LLC vs. Jacqueline Stafford
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 28, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit plaintiff additional time to complete service by publication. Plaintiff shall file proof of service no later than 2 weeks prior to continued case management conference date.
- CL0002311 United Financial Casualty Co. vs. Kaifus Klae Knoefler
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 28, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendant Knoefler as ordered by this court on March 10, 2025.
- CL0002401 LVNV Funding, LLC vs. Kim Dutra
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002457 State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. vs. Delvin Dunks
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 28, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0000376 Liam Moriarty v. Tahoe Club Employee Co., et al.
Appearances are required. This case was filed in 2022 and the court is concerned as to its age. The court seeks an update on the status of class certification and is inclined to set a deadline for any motion for the same by no later than Summer 2025. Additionally, the parties shall meet and confer regarding the necessity of a Belaire-West process for absent class members. Finally, plaintiff failed to submit a timely case management conference statement. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to file case management conference statements in advance of the continued date can result in sanctions.
- CU0001207 Amanda Powell vs. Briarpatch Coop. of Nevada, Inc., et al.
Appearances are required. The court seeks a status update from the parties. On March 24, 2025 the court ordered the parties to file a motion for preliminary approval of class and PAGA settlement prior to the continued case management date. No motion or settlement has been filed with the court.
- CU0001285 17031, LLC vs. Joseph Jacks, et al.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 4-day nonjury trial.
Trial: December 9, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: November 21, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: November 10, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001525 State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. vs. Joshua Edward Daniel
No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for July 25, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001661 Deborah Wagner vs. George McKnight, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to July 28, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001761 Ashley Sanchez vs. Vail Resorts Management Co., et al.
Appearances are required. The parties shall advise the court on whether Nevada County is the proper venue for this litigation and the basis for the same. Additionally, defendants are again admonished for failing to provide a timely case management conference statement. Defendants are advised that failure to file a timely case management statement will result in sanctions.
- CU0001780 Elliott Allen Roberts vs. Austin Wallace
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 28, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Wallace shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001882 Elizabeth Freschi vs. Drake Woodford. et al.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day court trial.
Trial: February 24, 2026 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: February 13, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: January 26, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
The clerk shall correct e-court records to reflect the correct surname for plaintiff: Freschi.
- CU0001885 Paula Onescu, et al. vs. Oakridge Apartments
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to July 28, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
April 28, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002430 State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. vs. Jeremy Ravenscroft, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CL0002431 Barclays Bank Delaware vs. Chris A. Pezzola
Appearances are not required. This case is at issue. Court trial is set for July 28, 2025 at 1:00 p.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall give notice. - CL0002435 Mercury Insurance Company vs. County of Nevada
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CU0000569 Susan Foote vs. Jenny Renee Hunter Kaeding
No appearances are required. A bankruptcy stay remains in effect. The case management conference is continued until July 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., in Dept. 6. The parties are reminded to file case management conference statements two weeks in advance thereof.
- CU0001386 In the Matter of Rise Grass Valley, Inc.
Appearances are required. The court is favorably inclined to adopt the stipulation lodged on March 7, 2025 as part of the County’s case management conference statement with page limits as follows: opening and opposition briefs-40 pp., reply brief-20 pp.
- CU0001454 16th LB, Inc. vs. Trusteel, LLC, et al.
Appearances are required. It is unclear whether Botanical Equipment and Research Federation, LLC have been served in this matter. The parties shall be prepared to confirm their understanding that each party has been served and appropriately filed a response to the complaint.
- CU0001524 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. Jerad G. Hioki
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall provide notice of continued case management conference.
- CU0001576 Michael A. Berson, et al. v. Martin, Daniel DDS, et al.
Appearances are required. Counsel Downing shall show cause for his failure to appear on March 17, 2025 and for the failure to serve and file the summons and complaint on Daniel C. Martin, DDS Dental Corporation. Parties shall confirm whether the case is at issue particularly as to the corporation.
- CU0001691 Scott Weidert vs. Heartwood Nevada City, LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001850 Raymond Davey v. Close Associates
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall provide notice of continued case management conference.
- CU0001853 John L. Dodd vs. Jacob O. Bjeldanes, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- CU0001854 Wesco Distribution, Inc., vs. Sustainable Energy Group, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff to provide notice of continued case management conference.
- CU0001860 Matthew William Vickers vs. Ariana Kathleen Vickers, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU21-085424 David Hunter vs. Bruce Coy, et al.
Appearances are required. The parties shall update the court on the status of defendant’s appeal.
April 21, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0001304 Discover Bank vs. Heather Glynn
No appearances are required. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code section 664.6.
- CL0002108 Dorton Drywall, et al. vs. James Clarke, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendants James Clarke and Liz Clarke shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CL0002112 Discover Bank vs. Susan Gisler
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CL0002278 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Vikki L Vincenzi
No appearance is required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this case dismissed for failing to file a request for default or a request for dismissal of defendant as ordered on March 3, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0000385 Derek Olsen, et al. v. David Sugalski, et al.
No appearance is required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or the action against Wild Acorns Learning Village dismissed for failing to file a request for default or a request for dismissal as to that defendant as ordered on March 3, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0000410 Taylor Strunk v. Stagecoach Motel et al
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
- CU0001237 Peter Lindley vs. Regional Emergency Medical Services Authority, et al.
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to discuss filing of and accompanying briefing schedule for a motion for adjudication of legal issues.
- CU0001307 Rick Ewald vs. Gary Liardon, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of remaining defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff to provide notice of continued case management conference.
- CU0001418 John Albert Bacon and Sandra Jacoby Bacon, Trustees, vs. Statewide Homes, Inc.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 5-day jury trial.
Trial: February 10, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 30, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: January 12, 2026, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001540 Bradley Dorigo., et al. vs. County of Nevada
Appearances are required. The court has the same proof of service for defendant State of California, filed October 21, 2024 and again on March 3, 2025. Plaintiff shall clarify whether all defendants have been served and file the appropriate proof of service.
- CU0001640 Evan Benn, et al. vs. Diamond P. Properties, LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Diamond P. Properties LLC. shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.The order to show cause against Counsel Binh Bui is discharged in the interests of justice.
Finally, all parties have again failed to file timely case management conference statements. The parties are admonished that failure to file case management conference statements in advance of the continued date will result in sanctions. Plaintiff shall provide notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001643 Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC vs. Ashley Parker, et al.
No appearance is required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or the action against Ashley Parker dismissed for failing to file a request for default or a request for dismissal as to that defendant as ordered on March 3, 2025. Additionally, plaintiff again failed to file a timely case management conference statement and shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001649 Debbie Havener vs. Shawna Sullivan, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why she should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendant Shawna Sullivan as ordered by the court on March 3, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001652 Pawnee Leasing Corporation vs. 1st Choice R & R LLC, et al.
Appearances are required. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned and/or their case dismissed for failing to file a request for default regarding defendant First Choice R&R, LLC., as ordered by the court on January 6, 2025.
- CU0001656 Richard Cristdahl v. Capital One Financial Corporation, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. The court has received the request for dismissal from plaintiff. This case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The order to show cause issued against Richard Cristdahl is discharged in the interests of justice.
- CU0001715 William Neil v. County of Nevada, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001750 McKellar Tree Service & Logging, Inc. vs. Blue Lead Gold Mining, LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Enegix Mining Group shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least one week prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference. - CU0001762 William Dean Ferreira vs. Stephanie Diane Stone-Ferreira, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001842 Charles Eugene Murdock vs. Jodi Michelle Andrews
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001844 Wells Fargo Bank vs. Tim Radford, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.Additionally, plaintiff failed to submit a timely case management conference statement. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to file a case management conference statement in advance of the continued date may result in sanctions.
- CU0001848 Pamela Bell vs. Dan Powers, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.Additionally, plaintiff failed to submit a timely case management conference statement. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to file case management conference statement in advance of the continued date may result in sanctions.
- CU0001849 Gregory Thrush vs. Jose Antonio Valdovinos
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Valdovinos shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.Defendant Valdovinos failed to file a timely case management conference statement and is admonished that failure to file a case management conference statement in advance of the continued date may result in sanctions.
- CU21-085893 Tom Amesbury, et al. vs. Barbara Heger, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 16, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- PR0000442 In the Matter of The Sandon Trust
No appearances are required. This matter was incorrectly calendared. The court continues this matter to May 23, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 for the petition to approve the settlement agreement.
April 14, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0001452 Thomas Duncan Meyers, et al. vs. Ada Mavis Hickey
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication, or a request for dismissal of Defendant Hickey no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CL0001563 LVNV Funding LLC vs. Brittany Couture
No appearances are required. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction following its dismissal without prejudice and subject to California Civil Procedure Code section 664.6.
- CL0002091 Laurie Kristin Agee vs. Melissa Loper
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to set a court trial date.
- CL0002395 Discover Bank vs. Natalie Bowen
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, an application for service by publication, or a request for dismissal of Defendant Bowen no later than one week prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0000943 Russell Roark vs. Stephen Cardosi, et al.
Appearances are required. Defendants Stephen and Kristyn Cardosi shall show cause for their failure to appear on March 24, 2025. Additionally, the court notes that both defendants have been served but there is neither a request for default from plaintiff nor a responsive pleading from defendants. Therefore, this case is not yet at issue.
- CU0001249 Tina Warner v. Jennie Pope
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why she should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication or a request for dismissal as ordered by the court on February 3, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
- CU0001395 Eric Butterworth, et al. vs. Mountain Concepts, LLC, et al.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0001444 Janet Littlefield, et al. vs. Homecraft Building & Design, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Cross-complainant Bartley shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication, or a request for dismissal of Defendants Old Bull River Construction and Montana’s Best Builders, LLC., no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Cross-complainant Bartley shall give notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001483 Susan Gabrielle vs. Phillip G. Conlon, Jr.
Appearances are required. This case is at issue. The court intends to set dates for a court trial. Cross-complainant Conlon shall provide a status regarding cross-defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust and its intentions with respect to the current default.
- CU0001544 Caitlin Peters vs. Cara Krpalek, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The service on defendant Jiri Krpalek appears to be defective. The proof of service does not indicate that a copy of the summons and complaint was mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid to defendant Krpalek at the residence where the copy of the summons and complaint were left, as required by Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 415.20. Plaintiff shall either file an amended proof of service or effectuate service in compliance with the statutory requirements no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001600 Darlene Lea v. Cynthia Chapman, et al.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. It appears this matter has settled. The court seeks an update on when the dismissal will be filed.
- CU0001651 Joseph Sacks vs. Navy Federal Credit Union
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001694 Tuyen Vuong vs. Cynthia Lynn Nulph
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial.
Trial: January 13, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 2, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: December 15, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001722 Micah Ellis vs. SPD Market, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial.
Trial: January 27, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 9, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: December 29, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001726 Gianna Garrett vs. Jack Laird
Appearances are required. The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s request to dismiss the first amended complaint. In light of that request, the court seeks clarification from plaintiff on status of the case, as it does not appear there is a pending complaint and no defendants have been served.
- CU0001738 Nationstar Mortgage LLC vs. The Testate and Intestate Successors of Gilbert J. Vega, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing to file a proof of service, an application for publication or a request for dismissal as ordered by the court on February 24, 2025. The clerk shall provide notice of the order to show cause.
April 7, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0002141 Discover Bank vs. Sequoia Nicholas
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CL0002373 Discover Bank vs. Patrick Weger
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0000191 David Elliott, et al. v. Ellen Nevarez, et al.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0000634 Carla Marie Vieira vs. Cal. Department of Transportation, et al.
Appearances are required. This case appears at issue. Counsel shall update the court as to the same and be prepared to discuss trial dates.
- CU0000991 Christopher Stormbringer v. Turning Point
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 2, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001162 Miles Hagood vs. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0001189 Corina Loving-Mills, et al. vs. Abby Eidson
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0001270 Marin Martin vs. Crystal Kanada, et al.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0001308 Cephren Jennemann vs. Gro-Tech Systems, Inc., et al.
Appearances are required. Plaintiff shall show cause for failure to file proof of service, an application for service by publication, or a request for dismissal of Defendant Gro-Tech Systems, Inc., as previously ordered. Additionally, counsel shall show cause for failing to appear on February 24, 2025. Finally, no parties have filed case management conference statements are required.
- CU0001320 Sara Bowling vs. Caseproof, LLC, et al.
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of settlement.
- CU0001347 Patricia Kukucka, et al. vs. Grass Valley S H, LLC, et al.
No appearances are required. The court on its own motion continues the case management conference to October 6, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to provide sufficient time for the parties to complete arbitration.
- CU0001354 Cynthia Gustafson vs. Safeway Inc., et al.
No appearance is required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 9, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why she should not be sanctioned for failing effectuate service on Store Manager, Doe 1.
- CU0001577 Public Risk Innov. Solutions and Mgt. vs. Sammies Friends Inc.
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 5-day jury trial.
Trial: January 27, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 9, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: December 29, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU0001813 USA Bath California Remodeling, Inc. vs. David Sweat
No appearances are required. This case is at issue.
Trial is hereby set as follows: 5-day jury trial.
Trial: January 27, 2026, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: January 9, 2026, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: December 29, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
- CU21-085797 Koslin and Koslin Construction, Inc. vs. GV Development LLC
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of dismissal.
- P89-10877 In the Matter of Thomas Michael Odom
No appearances are required. This matter was incorrectly calendared. The court continues this matter to May 2, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
- PR0000642 In the Matter of Shauna Geary
No appearances are required. The court has signed the stipulation and order. This matter is off calendar.
- PR0000664 In the Matter of the Dennis W. Babson 2000 Trust
Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of dismissal.
April 1, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CU0000284 Tod DuBois v Scott Fetty, et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001613 Judith and Coleman Bowman v. Town of Truckee
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0000656 Riley Gault vs. Mark Steffen
Appearances are required. The parties submitted an October 18, 2024, notice of settlement in this matter. The court needs the parties to verify whether this case has settled. The court is inclined to set another case management conference on May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, to permit plaintiff’s counsel sufficient time to serve the order relieving counsel on plaintiff at his current reported address in Colorado.
March 24, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0000572 Gerry Reis v. Roger Reis
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. An order to show cause hearing is set for the same date and time for plaintiff to explain why this action against should not be dismissed and/or plaintiff sanctioned for failure to serve the first amended complaint as previously ordered by the court. Additionally, plaintiff again failed to filed a case management conference statement and shall show cause why he should not be subject to sanctions. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference and OSC hearing.
- CL0001259 Deal, Thomas M v. Fred Gerkensmeyer, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The operative complaint is the first amended complaint. There appears to be a June 13, 2024 proof of service as to both defendants and no responsive pleading. These minutes shall be distributed to all parties and their counsel including counsel for the Regional Housing Authority, which made a previous appearance. All parties are directed to appear at the next conference.
- CL0001985 Cavalry SPV I LLC as assignee of Synchrony vs. Deborah Rawson
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CL0002062 Velocity Investments LLC vs. Devin Smith
This matter will be heard on the 1:00 p.m. calendar.
- CL0002352 Sun Forest Springs, LLC vs. Patricia Johnson
Appearances are required. Petitioner shall update court on the status of this case.
- CU0000512 eCapital Asset Based Lending v. Medina, Nicole et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to May 19, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 6 following pending motions.
- CU0001082 Stephen David Protzman Jr v. Hansen Brothers Enterprises
No appearance is required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned and/or his case dismissed for failing to comply with the previous order to file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (if desired), or a request for dismissal as directed on December 23, 2024. Plaintiff is also ordered to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to file and serve a timely case management conference statement. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference and OSC hearing
- CU0001207 Amanda Powell vs. Briarpatch Cooperative Of Nevada, Inc., et al.
No appearances are required. Upon the request of the parties, the court continues this matter to May 5, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 for status regarding class approval and settlement. The parties shall file a motion for preliminary approval of class and PAGA settlement prior thereto set for hearing on an appropriate future date.
- CU0001386 In the Matter of RISE GRASS VALLEY, INC., a Nevada corporation
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to April 28, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. The court appreciates the parties’ efforts to explore how appropriately to address the issues of this case including their stipulation as to bifurcation. At present, however, the parties have not explained why briefing of 125 pages is required to address the vested-rights related claim. The parties must provide the court with additional information as to the nature and complexity of this issue so that the court can make an informed decision as to the length of briefs to authorize. The parties shall submit a joint statement as to the same of no more than three pages no later than 14 days prior to the next scheduled conference.
- CU0001664 Carla Markeeta Jefferson, et al. vs. Heating-Cooling Service Co., et al.
Appearances are required. This case is at issue and the court intends to set trial. The parties shall meet and confer in advance and be prepared to suggest an appropriate trial date.
- CU0001723 Umpqua Bank vs. Joseph A. Miller, DMD, Inc., et al.
Appearances are not required. The court has received the March 20, 2025, report of plaintiff including its request to expand the receivership. No withdrawals shall be made from any bank account of the dental business unless agreed by all parties and approved by the court. Defendant shall file any response to the March 20, 2025, report no later than March 26, 2025, noon. Any reply shall be filed no later than March 28, 2025, noon. The matter is set for hearing on the law and motion calendar for April 4, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. A further case management conference will be set on that date. - CU0001796 Sonya Sokolow v. Environmental Health Director Amy Irani
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued until June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service of summons. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service or request for dismissal no later than one week before the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001811 Auto Fraud Legal Center LLP fna Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP vs. Dalton Workman
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to June 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Workman shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least one week prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.Additionally, Plaintiff failed to submit a case management conference statement. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to serve a statement for future case management conferences may subject them to sanctions.
- CU22-086160 KEVIN MALONE vs. WILLIAM FERREIRA
Appearances are required. This case is at issue.Trial is hereby set as follows: 9-day jury trial.
Trial: October 14, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: October 3, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: September 22, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
March 17, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0001239 American Express National Bank vs. Rose Cage
No appearances are required. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction following its dismissal with prejudice and subject to California Civil Procedure Code section 664.6. - CL0001344 Midland Credit Management Inc vs. David Villnow
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CL0001512 Bank of America N.A. vs. Soren Robert Darr
No appearances are required. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction following its dismissal without prejudice and subject to California Civil Procedure Code section 664.6.
- CL0001542 LVNV Funding LLC vs. William E Ferris
No appearances are required. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction following its dismissal without prejudice and subject to California Civil Procedure Code section 664.6.
- CL0002331 United Financial Casualty Company vs. Katie Powers
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued until May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, application for service by publication (if deemed appropriate), or request for dismissal not later than one week before the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0000828 Brooke Brady v. Carol Silverman
Appearances are required. Plaintiff shall show cause why she should not be sanctioned and/or this case dismissed for failing to serve the summons and complaint and failing to appear on September 16, 2024.
- CU0000948 Ivan Nyal vs. Jack Bacon
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
- CU0001181 Cynthia Hermosa vs. Adam Rayford Kilpatrick et al.
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. An order to show cause hearing is set for the same date and time for plaintiff to explain why the action against defendant Garrett Warner Woodgrift should not be dismissed and/or plaintiff sanctioned for failure to serve the summons and complaint. Additionally, no party filed a case management conference statement and is admonished that failure to serve a statement for future case management conferences may subject it to sanctions. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference and OSC hearing. - CU0001257 Barbara Cramer vs. Advanced Home Health and Hospice, Inc., et al.
Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of this case. - CU0001576 Michael A. Berson, et al. v. Martin, Daniel DDS, et al.
Appearances are required. This case appears at issue, but the court requests confirmation from the parties that all defendants have been served and answered. Specifically, has Daniel C. Martin, DDS Dental Corporation, d/b/a Tahoe Oral Surgery and Implant Center, a named defendant in the complaint, answered this complaint? Upon confirmation, the court is inclined to set trial dates as follows:
Trial: September 30, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: September 19, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: September 8, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6. - CU0001611 Fora Financial Asset Securitization 2021 LLC vs. TJ's Roadhouse of Nevada City LLC, et al.
No appearance is required. A hearing regarding default judgment is set for June 27, 2025, at 1:30 p.m., in Dept. 6. - CU0001620 Beau Grady vs. Loren Ralph Winters
Appearances are required. This case is at issue.Trial is hereby set as follows: 5-day jury trial.
Trial: December 2, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: November 21, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: November 10, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.The February 19, 2025 order to show cause is discharged in the interests of justice. The court notes that plaintiff failed to file a case management conference statement as required.
- CU0001698 James Saunders Grill v. Eleonore Anderson, et al.
Appearances are not required. The court has entered dismissals with prejudice for both the complaint and cross-complaint as requested. - CU0001781 Kathlene Bonnigson vs. Albertsons Safeway LLC
Appearances are required. This case is at issue. Parties shall confirm availability of dates below.Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial.
Trial: October 28, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6.
PTC: October 17, 2025, 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
MSC: October 6, 2025, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6. - CU0001787 Carol Lynn Hills v. State of California
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued until May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, application for service by publication (if deemed appropriate), or request for dismissal not later than one week before the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued case management conference.
- CU0001793 Jamie Davidson vs. Bluebell Holdings, LLC
No appearances are required. On the court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to April 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 following defendant’s motion to compel arbitration set for April 4, 2025.
- CU0001794 PHH Mortgage Corporation vs. Brenda Marie Durtschi, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Defendant Durtschi shall file a responsive pleading, or plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of defendant at least one week prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001795 Krissa Connelley vs. Todd Tuggle, et al.
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to May 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. Cross-Complainants shall identify and serve any desired “Roes 1 through 50” by the next case management conference.
June 5, 2025 Department 3 Guardianship Annual Review Tentative Ruling
Notice:
These are the Court’s tentative rulings. Attorneys and parties are directed to review the tentative rulings prior to the scheduled hearing. These tentative rulings will be adopted by the Court, unless the guardian and / or parent personally appears at the hearing and objects to the tentative ruling. The person requesting that appearance must notify the other party / parties AND the court before 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing date.
Email OA@nccourt.net with a copy to the other party / parties to give this notice. You may request to appear remotely by clicking here.
If you need any help with the information in the tentative ruling, you can:
- Find Your Court Forms - Guardianship for the forms stated in the tentative ruling. OR
- Submit a Self-Help request OR
- Send email to selfhelpcenter@nccourt.net OR
- Come to the Court’s Self-Help Center Monday through Friday for forms and information about the next steps. OR
- Consult a private attorney.
06/05/2025 at 9:00 a.m.
Guardianship Calendar Tentative Rulings Department 3
- Case No. PR0000255 In the Matter of: Aliyah P.
The minor has attained the age of majority. The guardianship has terminated as a matter of law.
- Case No. PR0000265 In the Matter of: Raymond R.
Guardianship remains necessary, convenient and in the best interests of the minor. The Court has reviewed the GC 251 Annual Confidential Status Report filed on 06/03/2025. Your appearance on Thursday, 06/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. is not necessary. The next annual review hearing is set for Thursday, 06/04/2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of the Superior Court of California Please check the Court website 2 business days before the hearing date to verify if you need to come to that hearing date.
- Case No. PR0000276 In the Matter of: Arianna T.
Guardianship remains necessary, convenient and in the best interests of the minor. The Court has reviewed the GC 251 Annual Confidential Status Report filed on 04/14/2025. Your appearance on Thursday, 06/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. is not necessary. The next annual review hearing is set for Thursday, 06/04/2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of the Superior Court of California Please check the Court website 2 business days before the hearing date to verify if you need to come to that hearing date.
- Case No. PR0000502 In the Matter of: Valeria G.
The Court has received and reviewed the GC-251 Annual Confidential Status Report filed on 05/06/2025. The matter is set for hearing on Thursday, 06/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of the Superior Court of California. Personal appearance is required unless Guardian files a corrected GC-251 Annual Confidential Status Report with complete information in items 3, 4, and 7 on or before June 3, 2025.
Friday, June 6, 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Friday, May 2, 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Friday, April 4, 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Friday, March 21, 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Friday, March , 7 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Friday, February, 7 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Friday, January 3, 2025 Department 3 Family Law Status Conference
Family Law Status Conference standard order terms.
The following terms apply to all of the below cases and are incorporated by reference into the tentative decision for each case. Review them carefully.
-
These are the Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at OA@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309, Ext. 4 no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court.
- If neither party gives that notice, your appearance at the status conference. is not necessary UNLESS the tentative decision in your case requires that appearance.
- No Judgment has been entered in this case yet. No Judgment or other orders will be entered automatically. Moving forward with this case will require action from at least one party.
- If you need forms or assistance with the orders in item 2, you may contact the attorney of your choice or the Nevada County Court Self-Help Center at selfhelpcenter@nccourt.net or 530-362-4309, Ext. 5. See Superior Court of the County of Nevada - Self Help Center | Family Law Facilitator | Small Claims Advisor (nccourt.net) for hours and further information.
- If both parties want to opt out of further status conference, each must notify the Clerk at nccounter@nccourt.net, with a copy to the other party. Unless both parties opt out at least three (3) court days before the status conference date, appearance at the next status conference is required.
- If both parties opt out of the status conference process, the orders to serve and file the above documents will be vacated at the time that this opt out is effective. These documents will still be required before the case can proceed further. The Court can place the case back on the Status Conference calendar and reinstate a filing deadline for these documents on request of either party or by the Court giving notice of a new Status Conference date.
- Submission of a settlement agreement and Judgment documents will vacate the Status Conference only after the Judge has approved the Judgment.
______________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001619
Petitioner: Knox, Keenen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Zolling, Kimberly
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-270 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001623
Petitioner: Kendrick, Scott
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kendrick, Karen
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001644
Petitioner: Peeler, Jennifer Jasmine
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Peeler, Jason Daniel
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001651
Petitioner: Ford, Tara
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Tyner, Cath
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001673
Petitioner: Dana, Jayleen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Dana, Justin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002167
Petitioner: Gross, Mary
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Gunderson, Byron David
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002176
Petitioner: Hinrichs, Samantha
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Salmonson, Karl
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the delivery method of the documents.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the delivery method of the documents.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002190
Petitioner: Plisik, Michael
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Plisik, Kristina
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002199
Petitioner: Lachman, Lori
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: McAlinn, Shawn
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the delivery method of the documents.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002205
Petitioner: Martinez, Sophie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Martinez, Anthony James
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002216
Petitioner: Kemmer, Susanne
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Tackaberry, Michael
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the person served or the date of service of the documents.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002217
Petitioner: Kenney, Amanda
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kenney, Jeffery
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002219
Petitioner: Castro, Kayla
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Castro, Louis
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . FL-115 is not complete. Proof of service was filed on the incorrect form and does not have all required information. If the original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. When the Court has the correct Proof of Service and it has been at least 30 days since that service, the Court requires one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . FL-115 is not complete. Proof of service was filed on the incorrect form and does not have all required information. If the original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. When the Court has the correct Proof of Service and it has been at least 30 days since that service, the Court requires one of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002220
Petitioner: Taylor-Hren, Megan
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Elliot, Jeremiah
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002228
Petitioner: Torres, Pablo
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Yarala, Stephanie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the delivery method of the documents.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002235
Petitioner: Thompson, Robert Wesley
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Allee, Rhonda Lee
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner unless nullity judgment is ordered by the Court.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent unless nullity judgment is ordered by the Court.
- Corrected FL-120 Response from Respondent stating the ground for dissolution of marriage.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002258
Petitioner: Thompson, Aaron
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Cohen, Liz
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002278
Petitioner: Lund, Ryan
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Hunt, Kylie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the delivery method of the documents.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002290
Petitioner: Amezcua, Corinne
Attorney: Thompson, Sara
Respondent: Amezcua, Kenneth
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002624
Petitioner: Fry, Maeve
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Fry, Orvin Carl
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002722
Petitioner: Schlanger, Karen Ann
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Schlanger, Eric Michael
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002739
Petitioner: Swisher, Brian
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Swisher, Christine
Attorney: Grim, Olivia
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002746
Petitioner: Salivar, Kathryn Louise
Attorney: Granger, Jennifer
Respondent: Salivar, Mark A.
Attorney: Bell, Joseph J.
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002769
Petitioner: Buletti, Cortney
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
Respondent: Buletti, Ernesto
Attorney: Creagham, Charlotte
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002772
Petitioner: Haguel, Rafael
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Greenberg, Elka
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002785
Petitioner: Perry, Rene S.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Perry, James F.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002788
Petitioner: Kelley, Rachelle
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kelley, Eric P.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002802
Petitioner: Freehling, Daniel
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Freehling, Adriana Caceres Arrieta De
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002823
Petitioner: Richard, Debra
Attorney: Thompson, Sara
Respondent: Richard, Gary
Attorney: Christie, Nancy
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
06/06/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002872
Petitioner: Bump, Paula
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Bump, James Ronald III
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 12/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001545
Petitioner: Nielson, Kyla
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Corbett, Wade
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- waived.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001570
Petitioner: Martisko, Mollie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Martisko, Chase
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001586
Petitioner: Setzer, Joe C.
Attorney: John Downing
Respondent: Setzer, Darline L.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001592
Petitioner: Zahediahrami, Seyed Habibollah
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Moseley, Haley Elizabeth
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001600
Petitioner: Talley, Krystal
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Carson, Alexander
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001616
Petitioner: Nelson, Geoffrey
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Nelson, Allison
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001618
Petitioner: Prieto, Savanna
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Prieto, Antonio
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001670
Petitioner: Hanson, Lora
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Hanson, Dustin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, both parties must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002051
Petitioner: Cooper, Theresa
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Cooper, Nicholas
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002057
Petitioner: Sawi, Kayla
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Sawi, Jared
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002110
Petitioner: Strouss, Nicole
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
Respondent: Strouss, Ian
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002116
Petitioner: Perrine, Kellie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Perrine II, Lyndon
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002117
Petitioner: Hallberg, Helen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Hallberg, Austin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002137
Petitioner: Hanson, Joseph Scott
Attorney: Anderson, William Self-Represented
Respondent: Hanson, Eva Marie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002140
Petitioner: Frye, Jeana
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Frye, Dwaine
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002152
Petitioner: Peters, Michelle D.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Peters, Justin J.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002578
Petitioner: Trelawny-Barrett, Alice
Attorney: Montgomery, D. Laurence
Respondent: Berry, Jacob Peter Erik
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002662
Petitioner: Stone, Brianna Elise
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Stone, Phillip Franklin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002673
Petitioner: Shady, Samantha
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Shady, Brett
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons if parties want date of marital termination before 05/22/2025.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002674
Petitioner: Morton, Kyle
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Morton, Lorelly
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002679
Petitioner: Farrage, Regina Mae
Attorney: Anderson, James-Phillip
Respondent: Farrage, Steven James Mason
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002692
Petitioner: Lawrence, Jeffrey Deinnis
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Lawrence, Christine
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. .
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002704
Petitioner: Elizade, Melissa
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Estrada, Benjamin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Respondent must serve disclosures because he signed settlement agreement. .
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002705
Petitioner: Dalbeck, Michael
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
Respondent: Knudeler, Stacey
Attorney: Miller, Chandra (Ltd. Scope)
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002713
Petitioner: Alexander, Amber
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Alexander, Glen
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002716
Petitioner: Mosbarger, Sarah
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
Respondent: Mosbarger, Jordan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons showing service of amended Petition and Summons.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Amended Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002717
Petitioner: Cordery, Rhonda C.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Cordery, William A.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure. .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002720
Petitioner: Jorgensen, Jazzmyn
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Smedley, Tyler
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 11/07/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/05/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/07/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
05/02/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002737
Petitioner: Garren, Eric
Attorney: Walters, Cleat
Respondent: Garren, Heather
Attorney: Miller, Chandra (Ltd Scope)
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001395
Petitioner: Restad, Barbara
Attorney: Montero, John V.
Respondent: Restad, Lawrence
Attorney: Self-Represented
- No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. No further status conference will be set.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001441
Petitioner: Menig, Faith
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Menig, Ryan
Attorney: Miller, Chandra (Ltd scope)
- This is the third status conference. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. No further status conference will be set.
- Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001458
Petitioner: Dalmau, Brandee
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Martinelli, David
Attorney: Walters, Cleat
- This is the third status conference. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. No further status conference will be set.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001467
Petitioner: Andrews, Jodi
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Walsh, Robert
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. No further status conference will be set.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001502
Petitioner: Garcia, Thomas Ronald
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Garcia, Candice S.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Judgment was entered between these parties in Case # FL0001500 on 07/22/2024. No case management is needed. The Court intends to dismiss this case if no party appears and shows cause why the matter should not be dismissed.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001508
Petitioner: Toohey, Candice
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Toohey, Brian
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. No further status conference will be set.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-110 Summons on Amended Petition
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons on original petition and on amended petition. OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001776
Petitioner: Clanton, Erinlee
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Clanton, Christopher
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001992
Petitioner: Skowyra, Allyssa Fennelly
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Skowyra, Daniel Joseph
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002007
Petitioner: Peterson, Julia Anne
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Miller, Matthew Scott
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002023
Petitioner: Leonard, Tamera Ann
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Leonard Michael Ryan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002050
Petitioner: Martinelli, Christopher Edmund
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Martinelli, Jennifer Lisa
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002063
Petitioner: Johnson, Nathan
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Johnson, Heather
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002407
Petitioner: Jaime, Kasey
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Jaime, David
Attorney: Anderson, William
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002539
Petitioner: Whetton, Lucy
Attorney: Alexander, Kristen
Respondent: Whetton, Guy
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002541
Petitioner: Monroe, Murli
Attorney: Mercer, Eric
Respondent: Guzman, Bryan Allen
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002542
Petitioner: Tracy, Michelle
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Lavoie, Jeremie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002543
Petitioner: Block, Sharlene Renee
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Block, Jeffery Steven
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002549
Petitioner: Berry, Rick
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Berry, Lisa Bonney
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002564
Petitioner: Canepa, Gabriella Frances
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Canepa, Andre Jae
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- MC-030 Declaration to re-submit Judgment for review.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002569
Petitioner: Luquin, Lauren Kathleen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Luquin, Edward Alexis-Garcia
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002570
Petitioner: Cook, Jeffrey
Attorney: Walters, Cleat
Respondent: Cook, Christina
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002585
Petitioner: Ross, Brittany
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Ross, Aaron Manual
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002593
Petitioner: Justyn, Emily
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Stafford, David Reed
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002620
Petitioner: Henslee, Shannon
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Henslee, Daniel Paul
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002631
Petitioner: Ford, Laura
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Harrison, Christopher Sr.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002640
Petitioner: Saari, Melinda Vienna
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Edgerton, Jamie Allen
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002652
Petitioner: Ostrofe, Sabine L.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Ostrofe, Allen F.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
04/04/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL21-016368
Petitioner: Demara, Sandra
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Demara, Robert
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The original Petition in this matter was filed on 03/15/2021 and served on 03/24/2024. The Court intends to deem the Petition filed on 09/19/2024 an Amended Petition based on that filing. The Court has not received proof of service of the Petition and Summons filed on 09/19/2024. Both must be served to proceed with this matter.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/21/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FLFL0002566
Petitioner: Clifford, Callie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Clifford, Traver
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 10/03/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 10/01/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 10/03/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0000830
Petitioner: Adams, Richard
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Adams, Tanya
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance or further status conference is contemplated by the Court at this time.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Petitioner: Schwartz, Patrick
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Schwartz, Lacey B.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. No continuance or further status conference is contemplated by the Court at this time.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL00001398
Petitioner: Tipton, Brittany
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Cook, Jared
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance or further status conference is contemplated by the Court at this time.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001416
Petitioner: Mantooth, Colleen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Mantooth, Steve
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001723
Petitioner: Hood, Megan
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Hood, Brian
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001898
Petitioner: Mallo, Mona-Lisa
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Mallo, Mark
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001915
Petitioner: Griffiths, Melinda Sue
Attorney: Anderson, James
Respondent: Fritz, Daryl Wayne
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001960
Petitioner: Keyser, Kevin
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Keyser, Rebekah
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
_________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001961
Petitioner: Vargas. Jeffrey
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Vargas, Molly
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001981
Petitioner: Farrell, Marcia Webster
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Farrell, Douglas Ted
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001982
Petitioner: Brautigam, Nga
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Brautigam, Jared
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001995
Petitioner: Colbert, Danyel
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Bartoli, Vincent
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-270 Response to Petition for Custody and Support of Minor Children OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002005
Petitioner: Rodriguez, Hope
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Rodriguez, David
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002018
Petitioner: Samson, Allison Rivers
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Samson, David Scott
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002029
Petitioner: Sullivan, Shelly
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Morrow, Nico
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. .
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . FL-115 is not complete. The address of service information is missing. If the original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. When the Court has the correct Proof of Service, the Court requires one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002397
Petitioner: Gerhart, Audrey
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Gerhart, Keith
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002417
Petitioner: Peterson, Ingrid
Attorney: Christie, Nancy
Respondent: Carter, Tom
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002433
Petitioner: Rocha, Ashley Anne
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Rocha. Lionel Cardoza II
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002475
Petitioner: LaGrou, Melanie
Attorney: Anderson, Sara (Ltd scope)
Respondent: Gardner, Brian
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons only if parties want termination of marital status before 03/19/2025.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002498
Petitioner: Guiterrez, Samantha
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Guiterrez, Israel
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Since Judgment was declined because there were no child support forms and calculation attached when the judgment did not actually ask for child support at this time, Petitioner needs to file an explanation and request re-submission. For forms or assistance with that, Petitioner may contact the attorney of her choice or the Nevada County Court Self-Help Center at selfhelpcenter@nccourt.net or 530-362-4309, Ext. 5. See Superior Court of the County of Nevada - Self Help Center | Family Law Facilitator | Small Claims Advisor (nccourt.net) for hours and further information.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002500
Petitioner: Hostetter, Raymond Wayne
Attorney: Klein, w. Gregory
Respondent: Hostetter, Shana Lee Johnson
Attorney: Anderson, James
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002504
Petitioner: Dixon, Jerry
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Dixon, Kaye
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002516
Petitioner: Foster, Mark
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Foster, Heather
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002517
Petitioner: Greene, Hannah Breeze
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Greene, Adam Abraham
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002518
Petitioner: Thibodeaux, Jennifer
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Thibodeaux, John
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002533
Petitioner: Baker, Typer Robert
Attorney: Bell, Joseph
Respondent: Baker, Sherron Angell
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002535
Petitioner: Kroner, Elisha
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kroner, Adam
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002554
Petitioner: Baker, Megan Rebecca
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Baker, Christian Lee
Attorney: Granger, Jennifer
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002565
Petitioner: Weisman, Zachary D.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Don, Evangelina
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 09/05/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/03/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/05/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
03/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002579
Petitioner: Foster, Jeff
Attorney: Strasser, Laura (ltd scope) Self-Represented
Respondent: Johnson, Ellen
Attorney: Gettys, Canence (Ltd scope) Self-Represented
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001315
Petitioner: Piaget, Isis
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Roldan, Pedro Merida
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001324
Petitioner: Gardner, Michael A.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Lucero, Sara J.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- One of the following:
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001765
Petitioner: Kenyon, Alison
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kenyon, Eric
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . FL-115 is not complete. The date and time of service are missing. If original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. Once correct Proof of Service has been filed, the Court requires one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001804
Petitioner: Langlois, Mary Lou
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Langlois, David Bruce
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001820
Petitioner: Flecksteiner, Annessa
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Flecksteiner, Jeffrey
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:.
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . FL-115 is not complete. The address information is missing. If original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. Once date of Service has been filed, the Court requires one of the following:
- FL-120 Response OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141.
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . FL-115 is not complete. The address information is missing. If original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. Once date of Service has been filed, the Court requires one of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001826
Petitioner: LeVeaux, Devon
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Lopez LeVeaux, Antonio
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001874
Petitioner: Holstrom, Richard III
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Holstrom, Ashley
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001905
Petitioner: Alvarado, Jesseca R.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Alvarado, Brian M.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002227
Petitioner: Wright, Dean Norman
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Wright, Carolyn Jill Crist
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002339
Petitioner: Greeley, India
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Greeley, Erik
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002349
Petitioner: Gordon, Gwen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Keyser, Herbert Carter
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002351
Petitioner: Gilchrist, Leanne
Attorney: Carter, Gregory
Respondent: Gilchrist, Timothy
Attorney: Bell, Joseph
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002356
Petitioner: Allen, Adriana
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Allen, Dustin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002360
Petitioner: Phillips, Morgan
Attorney: Foley, Ryan
Respondent: Phillips, Chandler
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002362
Petitioner: Smith, Andrea
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Smith, Jonathan Jeffrey-Lee
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002367
Petitioner: DeMario, Christopher
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: DeMario, Jamie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002373
Petitioner: Morales, Skye
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Morales, Jackie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002378
Petitioner: Dionne, Terii
Attorney: Christie, Nancy
Respondent: Van Der Zalm, Erikl
Attorney: Walters, Cleat
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002384
Petitioner: Foster, Scott Foster
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Foster, Andrea
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002391
Petitioner: Woodruff, Joseph
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: DeGennaro, Brandy
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002394
Petitioner: Wells, Lisa
Attorney: Walters, Cleat
Respondent: Wells, Ryan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002396
Petitioner: Thibodeau, Jaime
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Lucero, Angel
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002401
Petitioner: Uribe, Cesar J.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kelly, Nicole C.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . If original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. Once date of Service has been filed, the Court requires one of the following:
- FL-120 Response OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served and request to set prove-up hearing.
- Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons . If original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. Once date of Service has been filed, the Court requires one of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002404
Petitioner: Kiser, Lissa
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kiser, Richard Jr.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002408
Petitioner: McLees, Ryan
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: McLees, Giedre
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002418
Petitioner: Green Wells, Megan Frances
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Wells, Michael Ryan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002423
Petitioner: Garcia, Ruth Debora
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Garcia, John
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner AND Request to set prove-up hearing for nullity facts.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002425
Petitioner: Dreher, Elizabeth
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Dreher, Douglas Joseph
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002429
Petitioner: Foster, Kathy Ellen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Johnson, Samuel Elan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002437
Petitioner: Ingle, Robert
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Ingle, Melyssa
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002450
Petitioner: Nunnink, Danny
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Nunnink, Kyle
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
02/07/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002472
Petitioner: Mason, Kasi
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Mason, Timothy
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/1/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
*****
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001023
Petitioner: Davis, Jerrett
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Davis, Angel
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001159
Petitioner: Hojnacki, Jennifer
Attorney: Medina, Angelina
Respondent: Taapa, Jonathon
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review. If Judgment is entered before the status conference, no appearance is required.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL00001176
Petitioner: Adachi, Craig
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Adachi, Susan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001193
Petitioner: Belendez, Rachel
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Belendez, Robert
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001197
Petitioner: Trethewey, Mary E.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Trethewey, Paul M.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001203
Petitioner: Selletti, Stephanie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Selletti, Justin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001683
Petitioner: Skellenger, Jason
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Skellener, Katherine
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001710
Petitioner: Goodyear, Amelia
Attorney: Walters, Cleat
Respondent: Hippert, Joseph
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001712
Petitioner: Kanani, Babak
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kanani, Miriam
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001763
Petitioner: Menezes, Rebecca
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Menezes, Freddie
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001777
Petitioner: Brace, George
Attorney: Klein, W. Gregory
Respondent: Brace, Darci
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002282
Petitioner: Peternell, Raymond
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Peternell, Megan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002297
Petitioner: Nicholson, Cynthia Louise
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Nicholson, Justin Levi
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002312
Petitioner: Turek, Ricki Roberts
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Turek, Daniel
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Petitioner.
- FL20 Status Conference Questionnaire (Nevada County) from Respondent.
- The Court notes that FL-141 forms have been filed by both parties. Local FL 20 Status Conference Questionnaire from each party should address the resolved issues, the unresolved issues, whether the case would benefit from supervised settlement conference and / or is ready for trial setting.
- One of the following:
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002314
Petitioner: Coulter, Crystal S.
Attorney: Granger, Jennifer
Respondent: Coulter, Chris G.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002324
Petitioner: Entler, Ruby
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Shaw, Luke
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002326
Petitioner: Dugan, Kenneth
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Dugan, Tina Thayer C.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. Summons was not filed with the Petition. Court intends to issue an OSC to dismiss the case. Petitioner can cure this by filing Summons on or before December 31, 2024.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002333
Petitioner: Herzig, James
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Brown, Jessica
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002366
Petitioner: Click, Kevin
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Richardson, Hanamae
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 08/01/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 07/29/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 08/01/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
01/03/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002379
Petitioner: Montgomery, Linda
Attorney: Thompson, Sara
Respondent: Montgomery, Mark
Attorney: Gettys, Candence
- Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001040
Petitioner: Williams, Kendall
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Williams, RIcky
Attorney: Self-Represented
This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001071
Petitioner: VanValkenberg. Angela
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Clark, Gavin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001076
Petitioner: Duarte, Miriah
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Nicholson, Clint
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001103
Petitioner: Ly, Sarah
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Ly, Cun
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001105
Petitioner: Lerche, Ella
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Ramsay, Mitchell
Attorney: Self-Represented
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001109
Petitioner: Dunmire, Judy
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Dunmire, David
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001140
Petitioner: Whitley, Sierra
Attorney: Klein, W. Gregory
Respondent: Whitley, Thomas
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- One of the following:
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
_________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001313
Petitioner: Carver, Christopher
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Carver, Renee
Attorney: Self-Represented
- This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001619
Petitioner: Knox, Keenen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Zolling, Kimberly
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-270 Response to Petition for Custody and Support of Minor Children OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001623
Petitioner: Kendrick, Scott
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kendrick, Karen
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001626
Petitioner: Gutierrez Agoado, Christine
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Gutierrez Agoado, Richard
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- There are issues with service of process before the case can move forward.
- If you need forms or assistance with the orders, you may contact the attorney of your choice or the Nevada County Court Self-Help Center at selfhelpcenter@nccourt.net or 530-362-4309, Ext. 5. See Superior Court of the County of Nevada - Self Help Center | Family Law Facilitator | Small Claims Advisor (nccourt.net) for hours and further information.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001629
Petitioner: Driggs, Kristin L.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Driggs, Jeffrey P.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001644
Petitioner: Peeler, Jennifer Jasmine
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Peeler, Jason Daniel
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001651
Petitioner: Ford, Tara
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Tyner, Cath
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001673
Petitioner: Dana, Jayleen
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Dana, Justin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001692
Petitioner: Tostenson, Briannahlyn
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Tostenson, Michael
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0001702
Petitioner: Avery, Stephanie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Avery, Jerry
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002166
Petitioner: Nesbit, MIchele
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Nesbit, Evan Ryan
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002167
Petitioner: Grose, May
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Gunderson, David Byron
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002173
Petitioner: Nigro, Emily
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Nigro, Vincent
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002176
Petitioner: Hinrichs, Sandra
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Salmonson, Karl
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002178
Petitioner: Cyrus, Sonja
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Cyrus, Kalvin
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002190
Petitioner: Plisik, Michael J.
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Plisik, Kristina M.
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002199
Petitioner: Lachman, Lori
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: McAlinn, Shawn
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002204
Petitioner: DeLaughter, Breannah
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: DeLaughter, Cory
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002205
Petitioner: Martinez, Sophie
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Martinez, Anthony James
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of th tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002216
Petitioner: Kemmer, Suzanne
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Tackaberry, Michael
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed.
- Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.
- Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION
12/06/2024, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002217
Petitioner: Kenney, Amanda
Attorney: Self-Represented
Respondent: Kenney, Jeffrey
Attorney: Self-Represented
- Status Conference is continued to 06/06/2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 06/02/2025.
- The Court notes that the following are still required:
- FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
- One of the following:
- FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR
- Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14. Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR
- FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure .
- The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 06/06/2025, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
- The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
Truckee
Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309.
These are the Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at TRCounter@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309 by 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court. See California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.
Personal appearances are permitted. You may also appear via video by arranging a remote appearance at the time notice of request for oral argument.
Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court does not provide court reporters for case management conferences. Any litigant who wants a record of a case management conference must arrange for the presence of a court reporter at his or her expense. See Local Rule 10.00.3 B.
June 20, 2025 Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
- CL0001165 Victor Navarrete vs. Jennin Valentine Martinez et al
Appearances are required. Defendant JVM Landscape shall be prepared to inform the Court on the status of obtaining new counsel, and all parties shall be prepared to discuss the status of this case as this case is otherwise at issue.
- CU0000780 TIMOTHY CONTRERAS, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. PEAK LANDSCAPE, INC. a California corporation
No appearances are required. Both parties indicate this matter has settled via private mediation. The Court sets a further case management conference for September 19, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department A to provide the parties additional time to finalize the written settlement agreement, seek approval of same, and file a request for dismissal with prejudice. The parties are admonished it has already been six (6) months since they reached a settlement via mediation. The Court will not entertain a future request for continuance of CMC.
- CU0000852 Brandi Clark vs. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
No appearances are required. The Court sets a further case management conference for December 19, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department A to provide the parties additional time to complete already scheduled mediation and, if necessary, arbitration.
- CU0001216 Greg Bomhoff vs. Michael Decarlo et al
No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
- CU0001420 Michael Zucker v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
No appearances are required. The Court sets a further case management conference for August 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department A. Neither party submitted timely case management conference statements and are admonished that failure to do so in the future may result in sanctions. The parties shall provide the Court with an update regarding this litigation in their case management conference statements prior to the continued court date.
- CU0001445 James B. House vs. Gregory Atchley et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to August 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint, or Plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of Defendants at least one week prior to the continued case management conference.
- CU0001584 Matthew Coulter vs. Mark Olsen et al
No appearances are required. This case is at issue. The Court sets jury trial and related dates as follows:
Trial: March 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. each day, Dept. A
PTC: January 27, 2025, 1:30 p.m., Dept. A
MSC: December 19, 2025, 9:00 a.m., Dept. A (See, LR 4.02)
A pre-trial order shall issue. Unless a party objects to this tentative ruling and parties appear for CMC, parties are deemed to have waived notice of trial AND asserted they will waive conflict at the MSC allowing the trial judge to conduct the MSC.
- CU0001594 Craig Shaffer vs. Thomas Roland et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the court continues the case management conference to September 19, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A and hereby orders Defendants to appear and show cause on the same date and time as to why they should not be sanctioned $250 per each defendant for failing to timely file case management conference statements as previously ordered by the Court. Although this matter is presently stayed per stipulation of the parties, the Court is still required to manage the case to ensure it is proceeding timely. To date, it appears arbitration has not yet been scheduled. The Court expects the parties to update the Court as to the status of binding arbitration proceedings at the next CMC.
- CU0001614 Erik Narcizo Magana Lizarraga vs. Wesley Scott Malek
No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A to permit service by publication to be completed. Plaintiff shall file proof of service by publication prior to the continued case management date.
- CU0001662 Pankaj Gupta vs. Bamboo Ide8 Insurance Services et al
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to August 15, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failing to file an amended complaint within the time period previously ordered.Additionally, Plaintiff failed to file a timely case management conference statement and is admonished that failure to do so in the future may result in sanctions.
- CU0001747 Baozhen Huang et al vs. Derong Huang et al
No appearances are required. On February 25, 2025 Plaintiff filed a request for dismissal of the entire complaint with prejudice. This case is dismissed with prejudice.
- CU0001798 Thompson, Sheldon Lynn v. Callahan, Christina Joy
No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to September 19, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A and sets an order to show cause hearing on the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned or this case dismissed for failing to provide a proof of service, an application for publication (as appropriate) or a request for dismissal for defendants as ordered by this Court on March 21, 2025.
- CU0001802 Allison Bibbey vs. Vacasa LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;
No appearances are required. This matter has been removed to Federal Court. All future dates are hereby vacated.
As of May 15, 2023, the Truckee Branch will no longer be preparing and posting tentative rulings for Status Conference hearings for Family Law matters.
Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at TRCounter@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309 by 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court. Any argument is limited to five (5) minutes per party, unless the Court determines additional argument time is needed. See California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.
Personal appearances are permitted. You may also appear via video by arranging a remote appearance at the time notice of request for oral argument.
UNLESS THE COURT ORDERS OTHERWISE, THE PREVAILING PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A FORMAL ORDER SETTING OUT VERBATIM THE TENTATIVE RULING ANNOUNCED HEREIN (OR THE ORDER OF THE COURT FOLLOWING ORAL ARGUMENT SHOULD IT DIFFER) AND SHALL, THEREAFTER, PREPARE, FILE AND SERVE NOTICE OF THE ORDER PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.1312.
June 23, 2025 Department A Law and Motion Tentative Rulings
1. CU0001005 Forest vs. Caltrans, et al.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants’ Responses to Form Interrogatories is granted. Defendants do not disagree such responses are overdue, and both assert they will provide written responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One) without objections potentially prior to hearing on the pending motion, but no later than June 30, 2025. (See, Defendants’ Opposition, Page 3, ll. 5-9 and 15-18.) Accordingly, the Court orders Defendants shall serve written responses to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, without objections, by June 30, 2025.
Plaintiffs’ Motions to Compel Defendants’ Responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) and Requests for Production of Documents (Set One) is granted. Here, Defendants served objection only responses to Plaintiffs’ Special Interrogatories and Requests for Production on July 12, 2024. Thus, verifications to these responses were not required, and the 45-day timeframe in which to file a motion to compel further responses began with the service of the objections. See, Code Civ. Proc. §2030.250(a). However, the vast majority of Defendants’ responses to both these Special Interrogatories and Requests for Production were blank, with objections entered specifically in only a handful of responses.
An evasive or incomplete response can be treated as a failure to respond. See, City of Los Angeles v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (2024) 17 Cal.5th 46, 57.) Submitting boilerplate objections to a discovery request is not an appropriate or substantive response. Moreover, a response to some interrogatories does not divest a trial court of authority under CCP § 2030.290 to compel answers to interrogatories as to which there was no appropriate response. (See Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 406.) Therefore, while Defendants’ preserved their objections to the discovery requests to which Defendants made specific objections, technically no responses were provided to the remaining requests. Additionally, the legislative intent in establishing the statutory methods of obtaining discovery in the Discovery Act is to construe the provisions liberally in allowing discovery. See, Sinaiko, supra at 402; See also, CCP §2017.010.
Further, denying Plaintiffs’ motions would dictate a nonsensical result of time barring Plaintiffs from filing motions to compel further responses when no substantial responses were served in the first place. Moreover, Defendants have agreed to provide responses in substantial compliance without objections (except for those preserved) by June 30, 2025. (See, Defendants’ Opposition, Page 3, ll. 5-9 and 15-18.) Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motions to Compel Defendants’ Responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) and Requests for Production of Documents (Set One), and orders Defendants to provide responses, without objections except for those preserved in the July 12, 2024 responses, by June 30, 2025.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Admissions (Set One) is denied as moot. Plaintiffs’ motion is also denied as to deeming the requests admitted. California Code of Civil Procedure §1010 provides in pertinent part, “Notices must be in writing, and the notice of a motion, other than for a new trial, must state when, and the grounds upon which it will be made.” Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion only moves for an order compelling Defendants provide responses to the requests for admission. It does not move for an order deeming the requests admitted. Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Admission (Set One) were served on June 9, 2025, and verifications of those responses were served on June 18, 2025. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants’ Responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) is denied as moot.
Based on the above orders, Plaintiffs are deemed to have prevailed in their motion with the sole exception being with regard to the motion to compel as to Plaintiffs’ Request for Admissions (Set One). A party being successful in a discovery motion is the only prerequisite to the statute mandating the Court issue sanctions against the non-prevailing party, here, Defendants. See, CCP §2030.290(c) and §2031.300(c). However, based on the fact Plaintiffs specifically indicate they “are not asking for monetary sanctions here” (see, Plaintiffs’ Reply, Page 3, line 3), the Court finds such circumstance coupled with the lack of notice and opportunity to be heard on the issue of amount of sanctions make “the imposition of [a] sanction unjust” in this situation. CCP§2030.290(c). §2030.300(d); §2031.300(c).
2. CU0001216 Greg Bomhoff vs. Michael Decarlo et al
Defendant Lake of the Pines Association’s (hereinafter, “LOP”) Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint is sustained without leave to amend in part and overruled in part.
LOP’s request for judicial notice is granted; however, the Court takes judicial notice of the pleadings as requested yet not the truth of the contents therein. “Although the existence of a document may be judicially noticeable, the truth of statements contained in the document and its proper interpretation are not subject to judicial notice if those matters are reasonably in dispute. (Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of University of California (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 343, 364, quoting Freemont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 113.) “Taking judicial notice of a document is not the same as accepting the truth of its contents or accepting a particular interpretation of its meaning” and “[t]he hearing on demurrer may not be turned into a contested evidentiary hearing through the guise of having the court take judicial notice of documents whose … proper interpretation are disputable.” (Id. at 365, quoting Indemnity, supra, 148.Cal. App.4th at 113-114.) Put another way, when a court takes judicial notice of a document, “the truthfulness and proper interpretation of the document are disputable.” StorMedia Inc. v. Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th 449, 457, fn. 9; see also Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Ass’n (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 1202, 1215, fn. 4 [granting judicial notice of the existence of a property deed but not the truth of its contents.])
Given the foregoing authorities, the Court will take judicial notice as to the existence of each of the above documents but it declines to take notice of the facts or contentions contained therein or of their proper interpretation. (Evidence Code § 452(c).)
As to the third cause of action for Respondeat Superior, the Demurrer is sustained without leave to amend. Respondeat Superior is not an independent cause of action. A legal doctrine which affords a basis upon which to collect damages from a party is not a cause of action. (See, McBride v. Boughton (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 379, 387.) Plaintiffs’ Opposition asserts it can amend the third cause of action “to allege a cause of action for vicarious liability”. See, Opposition, Page 2, ll. 1-2. Much like alleging respondeat superior, vicarious liability is also a doctrine of legal liability as opposed to a legitimate cause of action. It is Plaintiffs’ burden to show the Court the Second Amended Complaint can be amended successfully in order to obtain an order allowing leave to amend. McKenney v. Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 72, 78; Weil & Brown, Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ. Pro. Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2010), ¶7:130 (citing Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d 335, 349). As Plaintiffs have failed to show the Court the third cause of action can be amended successfully, leave to amend is denied.
As to the fourth cause of action for Violation of Civil Code Section 5844, the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend solely as to Plaintiff Greg Bomhoff. This provision’s statutory definition of “member” is not the same as the definition of “member” in the bylaws. The statute requires ownership in order to allege a violation, and Plaintiff Greg Bomhoff acknowledges in the Second Amended Complaint he does not have an ownership interest.
As to the fifth cause of action for Declaratory Relief, the Demurrer is overruled. Such cause of action does not require any kind of relationship between a plaintiff and a defendant. Thus, the standing argument is without merit.
As to the sixth cause of action for breach of the CC&Rs, the Demurrer is overruled. Section 3(e) of the Lake of the Pines Association’s Bylaws states, “Whenever reference is made to the right of the Association to suspend Member privileges, that reference shall be deemed to include and refer to persons in all three classes of Members.” Thus, both members and associate members have the same rights and duties. Accordingly, Plaintiff Greg Bomhoff has standing as to this cause of action.
Finally, Defendant LOP’s alternative requests to strike are granted solely as to those requests consistent with the above ruling. However, should an amended complaint be filed, this alternative relief will be deemed moot provided the third amended complaint is pled in accordance with the Court’s ruling set forth herein.
Any amended complaint shall be filed and served by July 3, 2025.
Finally, the Court feels compelled to refer Lake of the Pines’ counsel to LR 1.06(A)(8)(i) and (iii). This defendant filed a 327 page document containing multiple exhibits including exhibits within exhibits without bookmarks and without providing a courtesy copy to the Court. The Court requests future voluminous filings by any party be filed in accordance with this Court’s local rules. This paragraph shall not be included in the order after hearing.
3. CU0001527 Julie Swan et al vs. James Valentine
The Court ordered the dismissal of this action without prejudice on February 24, 2025 due to Plaintiffs’ failure to timely serve the defendant with the Summons and Complaint in this matter and failure to show cause as to why the matter should not be so dismissed. In fact, Plaintiffs’ counsel failed to appear at the OSC re Dismissal. This was the second time Plaintiffs’ counsel failed to appear at an OSC re Dismissal, and this is the second time Plaintiffs have sought set aside pursuant to CCP 473(b).
The pending motion was filed on June 2, 2025 alleging as a basis for set aside Plaintiffs’ counsel’s having logged in to an incorrect zoom meeting for the OSC occurring on March 21, 2025. Just as with the prior motion to set aside dismissal, the current motion and all supporting pleadings are titled as a motion and support for a “Motion to Set Aside Default on Defendant’s Cross-Complaint Pursuant to CCP 473(b)”. Also, just as with the prior motion, Plaintiffs’ noticed the motion for the Nevada City Branch of the Court despite this matter pending in the Truckee Branch since its inception and despite the Court Clerk correcting the caption in all filings by Plaintiffs thus far to indicate the correct branch and department.
Plaintiffs’ motion is denied without prejudice both on procedural and substantive grounds. First, this motion was not timely filed pursuant to CCP section 1005(b). It was required to be filed 16 court days prior to hearing, which was May 29, 2025 (due to the court holiday occurring on June 19, 2025). (Notably, had the matter been set according to Plaintiffs’ erroneous notice, the filing would have been even more lacking.) Secondly, on the merits, Plaintiff’s counsel provides no explanation for the delay in filing the present motion. Counsel was well aware of any purported zoom confusion as of March 21, 2025, yet failed to file the present motion until June 2, 2025. Finally, counsel fails to provide any documentation evidencing the reason behind the purported login to an incorrect zoom meeting. Counsel asserts “it appears I was given the Zoom information for a separate coutroom [sic].” See, Declaration, page 3, ll, 7-8. Yet, such indication is vague, and there is no documentation to evidence if, in fact, such occurred. Based on this, the Court cannot find the dismissal of this action was the result of counsel’s mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect.
4. CU0001551 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. vs. Michael A Quinn
Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider and Correct Clerical Error is granted, and, on the Court’s own motion, the Court orders the Complaint to be similarly corrected NUNC PRO TUNC. The Court wishes to make clear, it does not find such results in any new opportunity for Defendants to Answer the Complaint or otherwise seek set aside of the default entered against them.
Plaintiff’s request to strike Defendants’ Opposition is denied. In that Plaintiff seeks something which is arguably beyond that which is sought in the Complaint, the Court finds it is appropriate to allow Defendants to be heard.
While the body of Plaintiff’s Complaint provides for an incorrect house number, the remainder of the body of the Complaint and all of its exhibits have the correct APN and legal description.
As set forth by Black’s Law Dictionary, scrivener's error or clerical error [is defined] as “a drafter or typist's technical error that can be rectified without serious doubt about the correct reading.” Black's Law Dictionary 659 (10th ed. 2014).
Thus, the Court finds that the scrivner’s error in the body of the complaint may be corrected without serious, let alone any, doubt to reflect the correct street address of “10314.” Further, the Court finds no prejudice to either defendant in correcting this scrivner’s error nunc pro tunc, in both the complaint and the judgment.
Finally, the Court wishes to clarify its prior order. It appeared to the Court, because the APN and legal description were correct in the Complaint and Judgment, the house number was superfluous and, thus, the Court need not create a new potentially appealable issue by allowing correction to the Judgment. However, Plaintiff appears to desire this change and has provided persuasive briefing on both the issue or reconsideration and correction.
5. CU0001911 Celeste Dexter vs. West River Real Estate, Inc., a corporation
Defendant West River’s Motion to Quash is denied without prejudice. This motion was not timely filed pursuant to CCP section 1005(b). It was required to be filed 16 court days prior to hearing, which was May 29, 2025 (due to the court holiday on 6/19/25). The motion was filed on June 3, 2025. In addition, the motion was not timely served. Such motion was required to be served (assuming agreement to electronic service) by May 27, 2025. However, it was not served until June 3, 2025.
The OSC re Dismissal is dismissed on the Court’s own motion. A proof of service related to the Summons and Complaint is now on file. Such determination is in no way a comment or finding as to Defendant’s assertion of improper service of same. However, such is sufficient to preclude dismissal on the basis set forth in the OSC.
6. TCU18-7124 Roxanne T. Jen vs. Michael P. Loney
The unopposed motion for order accepting referee’s final report and to relieve referee is granted as prayed. No appearances are required.
7. CU0001529 National Collegiate Student Loan Trust v. Kay
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Answers to the Requests for Admissions and Form Interrogatories is denied as moot as discovery responses were served on May 27, 2025.
As to Defendant’s Request for Sanctions, sanctions are denied. Sanctions are a remedy reserved for conduct that reflects bad faith, willful obstruction, or misuse of the discovery process (CCP §2023.030; Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1293.) Though the Court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery even if the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion was filed under Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1030(a), the Court finds the imposition of monetary sanctions would be unjust given Plaintiff’s attempts to request an additional extension and promptly providing discovery responses once alerted to the fact no further extension would be granted. Moreover, the Discovery Act imposes a duty on the moving party to show they have made a “serious attempt to obtain ‘an informal resolution of each issue.’” (DeBlase v. Superior Court (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 1279, 1284 [49 Cal.Rptr. 2d 229].) Delays which do not materially prejudice the opposing party and are aimed at ensuring accuracy and compliance do not support sanctions (Bahl v. Bank of America (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 389, 398.) Accordingly, Defendant’s requests for sanctions are denied.
Finally, the Court notes no declaration in support of the present motion was filed. Counsel for Defendant is admonished it is improper to simply attach exhibits to a memorandum of points and authorities. This paragraph shall not be included in the order after hearing.
These are the Court’s tentative rulings. In order to argue at the hearing, you must notify the parties and, thereafter, notify the clerk’s office by email at TRCounter@nccourt.net or by calling (530)362-4309 by 4:00 p.m. the court day prior to the date and time set for hearing. If you do not so notify all other parties and the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling of the Court. Any argument is limited to five (5) minutes per party, unless the Court determines additional argument time is needed. See California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3.
Personal appearances are permitted. You may also appear via video by arranging a remote appearance at the time notice of request for oral argument.
Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not be able to provide court reporters for probate or civil law and motion hearings and does not provide court reporters for case management conferences. Any litigant who wants a record of a law and motion matter or a case management conference must arrange for the presence of a court reporter at his or her expense. See Local Rule 10.00.3 B.
FOR ALL LAW AND MOTION MATTERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED, THE PREVAILING PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A FORMAL ORDER SETTING OUT VERBATIM THE TENTATIVE RULING ANNOUNCED HEREIN (OR THE ORDER OF THE COURT FOLLOWING ORAL ARGUMENT SHOULD IT DIFFER FROM THE TENTATIVE RULING) IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA RULE OF COURT 3.1312 AND SHALL, THEREAFTER, PREPARE, FILE AND SERVE NOTICE OF THE ORDER PURSUANT TO THE RULE OF COURT.
6-23-25 Truckee Probate Tentative Rulings
1. PR0000041 In Re Stein, Charlie and Greta
No appearances are required. The 3rd Accounting for each minor is approved.
Charlie Stein is no longer a minor. Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, the guardianship of the estate of Charlie Stein is hereby terminated. No further accountings are required.
The guardianship of Greta Stein’s estate remains necessary and convenient and in her best interests. Bond remains waived. The next annual review date is set for June 22, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. A. The 4th accounting shall be filed thirty (30) days prior.
2. PR0000599 In the Matter of Thomas Joseph Clarke
The Petition for Final Distribution is granted as prayed. No appearances are required.
3. PR0000782 Conservatorship of the Person & Estate of Craig Martin
No appearances are required. The Court finds notice has been given as required by law and pursuant to the Court’s prior order dispensing with certain notices. The Petition to Appoint Conservator is granted as prayed as such is necessary and appropriate. The Conservator is granted dementia powers pursuant to Probate Code section 2356.5(b) and (c). Conservatee is disqualified from voting. Bond is waived. Investigation report fee is waived. The first Review Hearing is set for June 15, 2026, at 1:30 pm in Dept. A. Conservator shall provide an accounting at least thirty (30) days prior. Ms. Lenore is relieved as counsel. The Public Guardian shall submit a proposed order granting conservatorship. Letter shall issue upon the filing of an approved order and presentment of proposed letters in accordance with the order.
4. TP14-5672 In the Matter of CAREY W CLARK
No appearances are required. Conservatorship shall continue as it remains necessary and appropriate. The 6th accounting is approved. On the Court’s own motion, future accountings are waived pursuant to Probate Code section 2628. The Court finds the Conservatee’s estate is not able to pay the investigation fee and hereby waives it. A Review Hearing is set for June 21, 2027, at 1:30 pm in Dept. A.
5. TP20-7605 In the Matter of AIDEN SCOTT ROLAND
No appearances are required. The Court has read and reviewed the Status Report and finds guardianship to remain necessary and appropriate and in the minor’s best interests. The next annual review is set for June 15, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. A. Guardian shall submit an updated Status Report thirty (30) days prior to the review hearing